VS
When evaluating costs, QQQU features a management fee (MER) of 1.55%, compared to 0.28% for HEWB. Performance-wise, QQQU has returned 22.89% year-to-date with -$0 M in net flows, whereas HEWB is at 32.69% with +$27 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
QQQU
HEWB
| AuM | $12.58 M | $349.73 M |
| Management Fees | 1.55% | 0.28% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.55% | 0.28% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.82% |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 31, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QQQU | -13.59% | +1.32% | +22.89% | +44.20% | - |
HEWB | +1.93% | +15.92% | +32.69% | +68.13% | +146.31% | |
| Flows | QQQU | +$1 M | +$1 M | -$0 M | -$2 M | - |
HEWB | +$7 M | +$15 M | +$27 M | +$26 M | +$35 M |
QQQU vs HEWB exposure
Countries
QQQU
Exposure data will be available soon
HEWB
Canada
100.00%
Sectors
QQQU
Exposure data will be available soon
HEWB
Finance
100.00%
As of July 31, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
QQQU
Exposure data will be available soon
HEWB
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.42%
Royal Bank of Canada
17.32%
Bank of Montreal
17.15%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.61%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
15.79%
National Bank of Canada
15.70%
Diversification
QQQU
Exposure data will be available soon
HEWB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
Characteristics
Compare
QQQU
HEWB
| Provider | LongPoint Asset Management | Global X |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | NASDAQ-100 Index - USD | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Capitalization |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 22, 2025 | January 23, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about QQQU and HEWB
Which ETF has performed better year to date: QQQU or HEWB?
As of July 31, 2026, QQQU has returned 22.89% year to date, while HEWB has returned 32.69%. HEWB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: QQQU or HEWB?
As of July 31, 2026, QQQU manages $12.58 M in assets, while HEWB manages $349.73 M. HEWB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are QQQU and HEWB managed?
QQQU is passively managed by LongPoint Asset Management. It tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index - USD benchmark. HEWB is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: QQQU or HEWB?
Year to date, QQQU has seen -$0.39 M in net flows, compared with +$26.84 M for HEWB. HEWB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of QQQU and HEWB compare?
QQQU has an expense ratio of 1.55%, while HEWB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
Recent articles about QQQU and HEWB
Bank Stocks: An Undervalued Gem?
Bank stocks are poised for growth amid declining inflation and rate cuts.
Posted on 7/29/2024 by ETF Market Canada inBanks
HEB ETF Spotlight: Hamilton's Newest Addition to its ETF Offering
Meet HEB, Hamilton’s new low-cost Big Six Canadian Bank ETF.
Posted on 5/2/2023 by ETF Market Canada inETFs
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.