QQQY
Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF

Full QQQY fund page
VS
HTA
Harvest Tech Leaders Income ETF

Full HTA fund page

Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF (QQQY) and Harvest Tech Leaders Income ETF (HTA) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that QQQY focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Business Services, and Finance, while HTA leans towards Technology and Sovereign. When evaluating costs, QQQY features a management fee (MER) of 2%, compared to 0.85% for HTA. Performance-wise, QQQY has returned 15.47% year-to-date with +$15 M in net flows, whereas HTA is at 22.79% with +$54 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-4.0-3.0-2.0-1.00.0%Aug 17Aug 24Aug 31Sep 8Sep 15

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of September 15, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
QQQY
-2.34%-3.00%+15.47%+20.36%-
HTA
-3.15%-1.78%+22.79%+26.53%+92.20%
Flows
QQQY
-$5 M+$4 M+$15 M+$20 M-
HTA
+$8 M+$22 M+$54 M+$49 M+$140 M

QQQY vs HTA exposure

Countries

QQQY
USA
94.06%
HTA
USA
94.15%

Sectors

QQQY
Technology
95.07%
HTA
Technology
98.93%
As of September 15, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

QQQY
Microsoft Corp.
11.32%
Apple, Inc.
10.78%
NVIDIA Corp.
10.15%
Broadcom Inc.
9.17%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
7.21%
Alphabet, Inc.
5.27%
Micron Technology, Inc.
5.06%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.94%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
4.46%
Intel Corp.
2.44%
HTA
Microsoft Corp.
5.91%
ServiceNow, Inc.
5.58%
Alphabet, Inc.
5.44%
Oracle Corp.
5.37%
Intuit, Inc.
5.29%
Motorola Solutions, Inc.
5.16%
Arista Networks, Inc.
5.08%
Amphenol Corp.
5.07%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
4.97%
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
4.96%

Diversification

QQQY
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 48 total
70.81%
HTA
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 25 total
52.83%

Characteristics

Compare
QQQY
HTA
ProviderEvolve ETFsHarvest Portfolios Group
ManagementActively managedActively managed
Benchmark--
Replication Method
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield11.06%8.36%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateOctober 13, 2023April 27, 2015

Frequently asked questions about QQQY and HTA

Which ETF has performed better year to date: QQQY or HTA?
As of September 15, 2026, QQQY has returned 15.47% year to date, while HTA has returned 22.79%. HTA is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: QQQY or HTA?
As of September 15, 2026, QQQY manages $127.99 M in assets, while HTA manages $877.29 M. HTA is the larger fund by AUM.
How are QQQY and HTA managed?
QQQY is actively managed by Evolve ETFs. It does not track an index. HTA is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index.
What sectors do QQQY and HTA emphasize?
QQQY is most exposed to Technology, Business Services, and Finance. HTA is most exposed to Technology and Sovereign.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: QQQY or HTA?
Year to date, QQQY has seen +$15.01 M in net flows, compared with +$54.39 M for HTA. HTA has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of QQQY and HTA compare?
QQQY has an expense ratio of 0.74%, while HTA has an expense ratio of 0.99%.
What are the top holdings of QQQY and HTA?
QQQY's largest holdings include Microsoft Corp., Apple, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc.. HTA's top holdings include Microsoft Corp., ServiceNow, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: QQQY or HTA?
QQQY holds 47 securities, while HTA holds 25. On holdings count, QQQY is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about QQQY and HTA

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds