VS
Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF (QQQY) and Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF (TLF) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that QQQY focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Business Services, and Finance, while TLF leans towards Technology, Non-Energy Materials, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. When evaluating costs, QQQY features a management fee (MER) of 2%, compared to 0.75% for TLF. Performance-wise, QQQY has returned 16.96% year-to-date with +$16 M in net flows, whereas TLF is at 23.93% with +$4 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
QQQY
TLF
| AuM | $130.36 M | $157.74 M |
| Management Fees | 2.00% | 0.75% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.74% | 0.96% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 10, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QQQY | +0.31% | +1.93% | +16.96% | +23.54% | - |
TLF | -1.83% | +1.02% | +23.93% | +32.80% | +93.39% | |
| Flows | QQQY | -$1 M | +$5 M | +$16 M | +$21 M | - |
TLF | -$0 M | +$2 M | +$4 M | +$1 M | +$8 M |
QQQY vs TLF exposure
Countries
QQQY
USA
94.06%
TLF
USA
86.56%
Other
13.44%
Sectors
QQQY
Technology
95.07%
TLF
Technology
90.81%
Other
9.19%
As of September 10, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
QQQY
Microsoft Corp.
11.32%
Apple, Inc.
10.78%
NVIDIA Corp.
10.15%
Broadcom Inc.
9.17%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
7.21%
Alphabet, Inc.
5.27%
Micron Technology, Inc.
5.06%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.94%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
4.46%
Intel Corp.
2.44%
TLF
Apple, Inc.
6.62%
Alphabet, Inc.
6.40%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
5.74%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
5.10%
Broadcom Inc.
5.05%
Applied Materials, Inc.
5.04%
NVIDIA Corp.
4.83%
Seagate Technology Holdings Plc
4.70%
Micron Technology, Inc.
4.48%
Arista Networks, Inc.
4.29%
Diversification
QQQY
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 48 total
70.81%
TLF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 26 total
52.25%
Characteristics
Compare
QQQY
TLF
| Provider | Evolve ETFs | Brompton Group |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 10.92% | 5.80% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | October 13, 2023 | May 20, 2011 |
Frequently asked questions about QQQY and TLF
Which ETF has performed better year to date: QQQY or TLF?
As of September 10, 2026, QQQY has returned 16.96% year to date, while TLF has returned 23.93%. TLF is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: QQQY or TLF?
As of September 10, 2026, QQQY manages $130.36 M in assets, while TLF manages $157.74 M. TLF is the larger fund by AUM.
How are QQQY and TLF managed?
QQQY is actively managed by Evolve ETFs. It does not track an index. TLF is actively managed by Brompton Group. It does not track an index.
What sectors do QQQY and TLF emphasize?
QQQY is most exposed to Technology, Business Services, and Finance. TLF is most exposed to Technology, Non-Energy Materials, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: QQQY or TLF?
Year to date, QQQY has seen +$15.72 M in net flows, compared with +$3.85 M for TLF. QQQY has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of QQQY and TLF compare?
QQQY has an expense ratio of 0.74%, while TLF has an expense ratio of 0.96%.
What are the top holdings of QQQY and TLF?
QQQY's largest holdings include Microsoft Corp., Apple, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc.. TLF's top holdings include Apple, Inc., Alphabet, Inc., and Advanced Micro Devices, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: QQQY or TLF?
QQQY holds 47 securities, while TLF holds 26. On holdings count, QQQY is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about QQQY and TLF
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.