QQQY
Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF

Full QQQY fund page
VS
ZWT
BMO Covered Call Technology ETF

Full ZWT fund page

Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF (QQQY) and BMO Covered Call Technology ETF (ZWT) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that QQQY focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Business Services, and Finance, while ZWT leans towards Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Business Services. When evaluating costs, QQQY features a management fee (MER) of 2%, compared to 0.65% for ZWT. Performance-wise, QQQY has returned 15.47% year-to-date with +$15 M in net flows, whereas ZWT is at 15.85% with -$8 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-4.0-3.0-2.0-1.00.0%Aug 17Aug 24Aug 31Sep 8Sep 15

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of September 15, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
QQQY
-2.34%-3.00%+15.47%+20.36%-
ZWT
-1.00%-2.10%+15.85%+20.02%+125.86%
Flows
QQQY
-$5 M+$4 M+$15 M+$20 M-
ZWT
-$0 M-$0 M-$8 M-$2 M+$31 M

QQQY vs ZWT exposure

Countries

QQQY
USA
94.06%
ZWT
USA
99.05%

Sectors

QQQY
Technology
95.07%
ZWT
Technology
89.26%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.94%
As of September 15, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

QQQY
Microsoft Corp.
11.32%
Apple, Inc.
10.78%
NVIDIA Corp.
10.15%
Broadcom Inc.
9.17%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
7.21%
Alphabet, Inc.
5.27%
Micron Technology, Inc.
5.06%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.94%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
4.46%
Intel Corp.
2.44%
ZWT
Apple, Inc.
9.60%
Microsoft Corp.
9.39%
Broadcom Inc.
8.13%
NVIDIA Corp.
8.00%
Amazon.com, Inc.
7.94%
Alphabet, Inc.
7.44%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
7.19%
Micron Technology, Inc.
6.39%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
4.46%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
2.78%

Diversification

QQQY
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 48 total
70.81%
ZWT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 30 total
71.33%

Characteristics

Compare
QQQY
ZWT
ProviderEvolve ETFsBMO
ManagementActively managedActively managed
Benchmark--
Replication Method
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield11.06%5.05%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateOctober 13, 2023January 26, 2021

Frequently asked questions about QQQY and ZWT

Which ETF has performed better year to date: QQQY or ZWT?
As of September 15, 2026, QQQY has returned 15.47% year to date, while ZWT has returned 15.85%. ZWT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: QQQY or ZWT?
As of September 15, 2026, QQQY manages $127.99 M in assets, while ZWT manages $208.41 M. ZWT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are QQQY and ZWT managed?
QQQY is actively managed by Evolve ETFs. It does not track an index. ZWT is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index.
What sectors do QQQY and ZWT emphasize?
QQQY is most exposed to Technology, Business Services, and Finance. ZWT is most exposed to Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Business Services.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: QQQY or ZWT?
Year to date, QQQY has seen +$15.01 M in net flows, compared with -$8.06 M for ZWT. QQQY has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of QQQY and ZWT compare?
QQQY has an expense ratio of 0.74%, while ZWT has an expense ratio of 0.72%.
What are the top holdings of QQQY and ZWT?
QQQY's largest holdings include Microsoft Corp., Apple, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc.. ZWT's top holdings include Apple, Inc., Microsoft Corp., and Broadcom Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: QQQY or ZWT?
QQQY holds 47 securities, while ZWT holds 30. On holdings count, QQQY is the more diversified portfolio.
CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds