RBCU
SavvyLong 2X RBC (RY) Equity-Linked ETF

Full RBCU fund page
VS
ZUT
BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF

Full ZUT fund page

When evaluating costs, RBCU features a management fee (MER) of 1.25%, compared to 0.55% for ZUT. Performance-wise, RBCU has returned 50.09% year-to-date with -$4 M in net flows, whereas ZUT is at 12.68% with -$96 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-8.0-6.0-4.0-2.00.02.04.0%Aug 4Aug 11Aug 18Aug 25Sep 1

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of September 3, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
RBCU
-1.77%+18.79%+50.09%--
ZUT
-7.03%-6.25%+12.68%+19.36%+47.83%
Flows
RBCU
+$0 M+$1 M-$4 M--
ZUT
+$23 M-$18 M-$96 M-$89 M+$217 M

RBCU vs ZUT exposure

Countries

RBCU
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Canada
84.41%
Bermuda
15.59%

Sectors

RBCU
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Utilities
83.73%
Energy
8.32%
Industrials
7.95%
As of September 3, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

RBCU
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Boralex, Inc.
9.47%
ATCO Ltd.
8.45%
AltaGas Ltd.
8.32%
Canadian Utilities Ltd.
8.09%
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP
7.95%
Capital Power Corp.
7.68%
Brookfield Renewable Partners LP
7.64%
Emera, Inc.
7.35%
TransAlta Corp.
7.18%
Northland Power, Inc.
7.08%

Diversification

RBCU
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 13 total
79.21%

Characteristics

Compare
RBCU
ZUT
ProviderLongPoint Asset ManagementBMO
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkRY Price - USDSolactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield-2.93%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateOctober 20, 2025January 19, 2010

Frequently asked questions about RBCU and ZUT

Which ETF has performed better year to date: RBCU or ZUT?
As of September 3, 2026, RBCU has returned 50.09% year to date, while ZUT has returned 12.68%. RBCU is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: RBCU or ZUT?
As of September 3, 2026, RBCU manages $2.91 M in assets, while ZUT manages $811.97 M. ZUT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are RBCU and ZUT managed?
RBCU is passively managed by LongPoint Asset Management. It tracks the RY Price - USD benchmark. ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: RBCU or ZUT?
Year to date, RBCU has seen -$3.61 M in net flows, compared with -$96.30 M for ZUT. RBCU has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of RBCU and ZUT compare?
RBCU has an expense ratio of 1.25%, while ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.

Recent articles about RBCU and ZUT

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds