RCAN
RBC Canadian Equity ETF

Full RCAN fund page
VS
MCLC
Manulife Multifactor Canadian Large Cap Index ETF

Full MCLC fund page

Compare RBC Canadian Equity ETF (RCAN) vs Manulife Multifactor Canadian Large Cap Index ETF (MCLC) to find the best fit for your portfolio. RCAN and MCLC provide the same top sector exposures: Finance, Energy, and Non-Energy Materials. When evaluating costs, RCAN features a management fee (MER) of 0.39%, compared to 0.35% for MCLC. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-3.0-2.0-1.00.01.0%Aug 17Aug 24Aug 31Sep 8Sep 15

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of September 17, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
RCAN
-2.18%+2.19%---
MCLC
-0.93%+3.58%+17.66%+28.00%+91.07%
Flows
RCAN
+$1 M-$1 M---
MCLC
-$15 M-$18 M+$107 M+$92 M-$6 M

RCAN vs MCLC exposure

Countries

RCAN
Canada
97.37%
MCLC
Canada
97.80%

Sectors

RCAN
Finance
43.16%
Energy
17.75%
Non-Energy Materials
9.87%
Industrials
9.71%
Other
19.51%
MCLC
Finance
39.16%
Energy
20.70%
Non-Energy Materials
14.92%
Other
25.22%
As of September 17, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

RCAN
Royal Bank of Canada
7.92%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
5.93%
Brookfield Corp.
4.10%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
4.00%
Bank of Montreal
3.81%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
3.36%
Enbridge, Inc.
3.31%
Manulife Financial Corp.
3.24%
Shopify, Inc.
3.21%
Suncor Energy, Inc.
3.11%
MCLC
Royal Bank of Canada
4.46%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
4.34%
Suncor Energy, Inc.
4.18%
Cenovus Energy, Inc.
3.85%
Sun Life Financial, Inc.
3.67%
Bank of Montreal
3.48%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
3.22%
Brookfield Corp.
3.20%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
3.20%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
2.86%

Diversification

RCAN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 54 total
42.00%
MCLC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 80 total
36.45%

Characteristics

Compare
RCAN
MCLC
ProviderRBC Global Asset ManagementManulife Investments
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-John Hancock Dimensional Canadian Large Cap Equity Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield-1.63%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateMarch 25, 2026April 17, 2017

Frequently asked questions about RCAN and MCLC

Which ETF is larger by assets under management: RCAN or MCLC?
As of September 17, 2026, RCAN manages $12.03 M in assets, while MCLC manages $546.87 M. MCLC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are RCAN and MCLC managed?
RCAN is actively managed by RBC Global Asset Management. It does not track an index. MCLC is passively managed by Manulife Investments. It tracks the John Hancock Dimensional Canadian Large Cap Equity Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do RCAN and MCLC emphasize?
RCAN is most exposed to Finance, Energy, and Non-Energy Materials. MCLC is most exposed to Finance, Energy, and Non-Energy Materials.
How do the fees of RCAN and MCLC compare?
RCAN has an expense ratio of 0.39%, while MCLC has an expense ratio of 0.40%.
What are the top holdings of RCAN and MCLC?
RCAN's largest holdings include Royal Bank of Canada, The Toronto-Dominion Bank, and Brookfield Corp.. MCLC's top holdings include Royal Bank of Canada, The Toronto-Dominion Bank, and Suncor Energy, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: RCAN or MCLC?
RCAN holds 54 securities, while MCLC holds 80. On holdings count, MCLC is the more diversified portfolio.
CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds