RCDB
RBC Canadian Discount Bond ETF

Full RCDB fund page
VS
HBNK
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index ETF

Full HBNK fund page

When evaluating costs, RCDB features a management fee (MER) of 0.15%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Performance-wise, RCDB has returned 0.7% year-to-date with +$115 M in net flows, whereas HBNK is at 12.68% with -$465 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

051015%Mar 20Mar 27Apr 6Apr 13Apr 20

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of April 20, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
RCDB
+0.99%+0.44%+0.70%+3.14%+13.86%
HBNK
+11.50%+11.72%+12.68%+72.77%-
Flows
RCDB
-$37 M+$107 M+$115 M+$197 M+$448 M
HBNK
-$214 M-$423 M-$465 M-$720 M-

RCDB vs HBNK exposure

Countries

RCDB
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Canada
99.69%

Sectors

RCDB
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Financials
99.69%
As of April 20, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

RCDB
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
17.58%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
17.35%
TORONTO DOMINION
17.25%
BNS
16.27%
ROYAL BK CANADA
15.76%
BANK OF MONTREAL
15.48%

Diversification

RCDB
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.69%

Characteristics

Compare
RCDB
HBNK
ProviderRBC Global Asset ManagementGlobal X
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassFixed IncomeEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield2.05%2.92%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJune 12, 2019July 5, 2023

Frequently asked questions about RCDB and HBNK

Which ETF has performed better year to date: RCDB or HBNK?
As of April 20, 2026, RCDB has returned 0.70% year to date, while HBNK has returned 12.68%. HBNK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: RCDB or HBNK?
As of April 20, 2026, RCDB manages $1.39 B in assets, while HBNK manages $665.20 M. RCDB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are RCDB and HBNK managed?
RCDB is actively managed by RBC Global Asset Management. It does not track an index. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: RCDB or HBNK?
Year to date, RCDB has seen +$115.40 M in net flows, compared with -$465.43 M for HBNK. RCDB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of RCDB and HBNK compare?
RCDB has an expense ratio of 0.17%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.

Recent articles about RCDB and HBNK

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds