VS
When evaluating costs, RDDY features a management fee (MER) of 0.4%, compared to 0.55% for ZUT. Performance-wise, RDDY has returned 28.66% year-to-date with +$79 M in net flows, whereas ZUT is at 16.24% with -$70 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
RDDY
ZUT
| AuM | $99.35 M | $862.78 M |
| Management Fees | 0.40% | 0.55% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.40% | 0.61% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.73% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RDDY | +2.00% | -13.43% | -28.66% | - | - |
ZUT | +3.85% | -4.33% | +16.24% | +9.35% | +69.53% | |
| Flows | RDDY | +$2 M | +$32 M | +$79 M | - | - |
ZUT | +$25 M | +$56 M | -$70 M | -$4 M | +$257 M |
RDDY vs ZUT exposure
Countries
RDDY
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Canada
82.83%
Bermuda
17.17%
Sectors
RDDY
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Utilities
82.26%
Energy
9.30%
Industrials
8.44%
As of October 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
RDDY
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
AltaGas Ltd.
9.30%
ATCO Ltd.
9.15%
Canadian Utilities Ltd.
8.78%
Brookfield Renewable Partners LP
8.73%
Capital Power Corp.
8.69%
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP
8.44%
Northland Power, Inc.
8.00%
TransAlta Corp.
7.98%
Emera, Inc.
7.97%
Fortis, Inc.
7.90%
Diversification
RDDY
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 12 total
84.93%
Characteristics
Compare
RDDY
ZUT
| Provider | Harvest Portfolios Group | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | - | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | - | 2.85% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | October 1, 2025 | January 19, 2010 |
Frequently asked questions about RDDY and ZUT
Which ETF has performed better year to date: RDDY or ZUT?
As of October 16, 2026, RDDY has returned -28.66% year to date, while ZUT has returned 16.24%. ZUT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: RDDY or ZUT?
As of October 16, 2026, RDDY manages $99.35 M in assets, while ZUT manages $862.78 M. ZUT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are RDDY and ZUT managed?
RDDY is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index. ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: RDDY or ZUT?
Year to date, RDDY has seen +$79.01 M in net flows, compared with -$69.96 M for ZUT. RDDY has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of RDDY and ZUT compare?
RDDY has an expense ratio of 0.40%, while ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.
Recent articles about RDDY and ZUT
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.