RDE
Purpose Core Equity Income Fund

Full RDE fund page
VS
CCDC
CIBC Canadian High Dividend Covered Call ETF

Full CCDC fund page

Purpose Core Equity Income Fund (RDE) and CIBC Canadian High Dividend Covered Call ETF (CCDC) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that RDE focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Financials, Energy, and Industrials, while CCDC leans towards Financials, Energy, and Materials. When evaluating costs, RDE features a management fee (MER) of 0.75%, compared to 0.5% for CCDC. Performance-wise, RDE has returned 18.55% year-to-date with -$33 M in net flows, whereas CCDC is at 14.82% with +$11 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0.01.02.03.04.0%May 19May 26Jun 2Jun 9Jun 16

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 16, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
RDE
+3.57%+11.82%+18.55%+36.64%+74.50%
CCDC
+3.91%+8.17%+14.82%--
Flows
RDE
+$3 M+$8 M-$33 M+$29 M+$66 M
CCDC
+$2 M+$7 M+$11 M--

RDE vs CCDC exposure

Countries

RDE
Canada
66.17%
USA
17.70%
Other
16.13%
CCDC
Canada
93.95%

Sectors

RDE
Financials
28.14%
Energy
14.46%
Industrials
9.52%
Consumer Staples
8.43%
Health Care
8.07%
Other
31.38%
CCDC
Financials
37.44%
Energy
21.10%
Materials
9.50%
Industrials
8.05%
Other
7.87%
Other
16.04%
As of June 16, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

RDE
BNS
5.17%
BANK OF MONTREAL
5.05%
ROYAL BK CANADA
4.80%
FINNING INTL
3.97%
ARC RESOURCES
3.66%
CDN NATL RAILWAY
3.56%
SUN LIFE FINL
3.52%
PROCTERGAMBLE
3.51%
PEMBINA PIPELINE
3.37%
ALPHABET INC-CL
3.36%
CCDC
ROYAL BK CANADA
8.28%
BANK OF MONTREAL
6.91%
TORONTO DOMINION
6.86%
ENBRIDGE
5.65%
BNS
5.05%
CDN NATURAL RESOURCE
4.64%
MANULIFE-S
4.63%
CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY
4.09%
AGNICO EAGLE MINES LTD
3.68%
INTACT FINANCIAL
3.65%

Diversification

RDE
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 32 total
39.97%
CCDC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 29 total
53.43%

Characteristics

Compare
RDE
CCDC
ProviderPurpose InvestmentsCIBC
ManagementActively managedActively managed
Benchmark--
Replication Method
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield5.54%-
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateMay 11, 2017August 25, 2025

Frequently asked questions about RDE and CCDC

Which ETF has performed better year to date: RDE or CCDC?
As of June 16, 2026, RDE has returned 18.55% year to date, while CCDC has returned 14.82%. RDE is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: RDE or CCDC?
As of June 16, 2026, RDE manages $98.34 M in assets, while CCDC manages $21.54 M. RDE is the larger fund by AUM.
How are RDE and CCDC managed?
RDE is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index. CCDC is actively managed by CIBC. It does not track an index.
What sectors do RDE and CCDC emphasize?
RDE is most exposed to Financials, Energy, and Industrials. CCDC is most exposed to Financials, Energy, and Materials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: RDE or CCDC?
Year to date, RDE has seen -$33.31 M in net flows, compared with +$11.40 M for CCDC. CCDC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of RDE and CCDC compare?
RDE has an expense ratio of 0.82%, while CCDC has an expense ratio of 0.50%.
What are the top holdings of RDE and CCDC?
RDE's largest holdings include BNS, BANK OF MONTREAL, and ROYAL BK CANADA. CCDC's top holdings include ROYAL BK CANADA, BANK OF MONTREAL, and TORONTO DOMINION.
Which ETF is more diversified: RDE or CCDC?
RDE holds 32 securities, while CCDC holds 28. On holdings count, RDE is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about RDE and CCDC

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds