VS
Compare Purpose Core Equity Income Fund (RDE) vs Purpose Core Dividend Fund ETF (PDF) to find the best fit for your portfolio. RDE provides Financials, Energy, and Industrials exposures, while PDF is primarily weighted in Financials, Energy, and Materials. When evaluating costs, RDE features a management fee (MER) of 0.75%, compared to 0.55% for PDF. Performance-wise, RDE has returned 17.55% year-to-date with -$33 M in net flows, whereas PDF is at 16.27% with -$37 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
RDE
PDF
| AuM | $97.51 M | $243.43 M |
| Management Fees | 0.75% | 0.55% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.82% | 0.66% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 17, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RDE | +2.70% | +10.50% | +17.55% | +35.82% | +73.06% |
PDF | +4.23% | +9.50% | +16.27% | +31.99% | +65.08% | |
| Flows | RDE | +$3 M | +$8 M | -$33 M | +$29 M | +$66 M |
PDF | +$3 M | +$4 M | -$37 M | +$10 M | +$7 M |
RDE vs PDF exposure
Countries
RDE
Canada
66.17%
USA
17.70%
Other
16.13%
PDF
Canada
74.41%
USA
22.48%
Sectors
RDE
Financials
28.14%
Energy
14.46%
Industrials
9.52%
Consumer Staples
8.43%
Health Care
8.07%
Other
31.38%
PDF
Financials
34.61%
Energy
17.50%
Materials
7.38%
Consumer Discretionary
7.04%
Health Care
7.03%
Other
26.44%
As of June 17, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
RDE
BNS
5.17%
BANK OF MONTREAL
5.05%
ROYAL BK CANADA
4.80%
FINNING INTL
3.97%
ARC RESOURCES
3.66%
CDN NATL RAILWAY
3.56%
SUN LIFE FINL
3.52%
PROCTERGAMBLE
3.51%
PEMBINA PIPELINE
3.37%
ALPHABET INC-CL
3.36%
PDF
TORONTO DOMINION
5.80%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
4.85%
ROYAL BK CANADA
4.61%
MANULIFE-S
3.62%
BNS
3.59%
TC ENERGY CORP
3.46%
AGNICO EAGLE MINES LTD
3.16%
ENBRIDGE
3.08%
PEMBINA PIPELINE
2.94%
BANK OF MONTREAL
2.83%
Diversification
RDE
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 32 total
39.97%
PDF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 54 total
37.94%
Characteristics
Compare
RDE
PDF
| Provider | Purpose Investments | Purpose Investments |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 5.58% | 2.63% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 11, 2017 | September 3, 2013 |
Frequently asked questions about RDE and PDF
Which ETF has performed better year to date: RDE or PDF?
As of June 17, 2026, RDE has returned 17.55% year to date, while PDF has returned 16.27%. RDE is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: RDE or PDF?
As of June 17, 2026, RDE manages $97.51 M in assets, while PDF manages $243.43 M. PDF is the larger fund by AUM.
How are RDE and PDF managed?
RDE is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index. PDF is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index.
What sectors do RDE and PDF emphasize?
RDE is most exposed to Financials, Energy, and Industrials. PDF is most exposed to Financials, Energy, and Materials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: RDE or PDF?
Year to date, RDE has seen -$33.31 M in net flows, compared with -$37.41 M for PDF. RDE has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of RDE and PDF compare?
RDE has an expense ratio of 0.82%, while PDF has an expense ratio of 0.66%.
What are the top holdings of RDE and PDF?
RDE's largest holdings include BNS, BANK OF MONTREAL, and ROYAL BK CANADA. PDF's top holdings include TORONTO DOMINION, CDN IMPERIAL BK, and ROYAL BK CANADA.
Which ETF is more diversified: RDE or PDF?
RDE holds 32 securities, while PDF holds 54. On holdings count, PDF is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about RDE and PDF
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.