VS
Compare Purpose Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (REM) vs BMO Covered Call Utilities ETF (ZWU) to find the best fit for your portfolio. REM provides Finance, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Technology exposures, while ZWU is primarily weighted in Utilities, Energy, and Telecommunications. When evaluating costs, REM features a management fee (MER) of 0.8%, compared to 0.65% for ZWU. Performance-wise, REM has returned 25.64% year-to-date with +$6 M in net flows, whereas ZWU is at 6.05% with +$188 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
REM
ZWU
| AuM | $26.04 M | $2,159.28 M |
| Management Fees | 0.80% | 0.65% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.31% | 0.71% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 17, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | REM | +4.80% | +2.67% | +25.64% | +29.96% | +80.38% |
ZWU | -2.71% | -4.10% | +6.05% | +6.94% | +34.79% | |
| Flows | REM | +$1 M | +$1 M | +$6 M | +$10 M | +$10 M |
ZWU | +$30 M | +$104 M | +$188 M | +$300 M | +$342 M |
REM vs ZWU exposure
Countries
REM
China
25.33%
Brazil
17.83%
Other
13.91%
Taiwan
13.28%
Mexico
7.27%
Other
22.39%
ZWU
Canada
56.27%
USA
38.93%
Sectors
REM
Finance
38.23%
Other
13.91%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
11.30%
Technology
9.14%
Non-Energy Materials
8.56%
Energy
7.87%
Other
11.01%
ZWU
Utilities
48.37%
Energy
26.85%
Telecommunications
20.39%
As of September 17, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
REM
CA74643B1031
12.78%
United Microelectronics Corp.
2.77%
MediaTek, Inc.
2.67%
Petróleo Brasileiro SA
2.47%
MercadoLibre, Inc.
2.24%
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.
2.22%
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
2.19%
China Construction Bank Corp.
2.14%
Vale SA
2.11%
Standard Bank Group Ltd.
2.03%
ZWU
Fortis, Inc.
5.53%
Hydro One Ltd.
5.47%
TC Energy Corp.
5.24%
Enbridge, Inc.
5.15%
Pembina Pipeline Corp.
5.00%
Verizon Communications, Inc.
4.74%
Emera, Inc.
4.57%
The Williams Cos., Inc.
4.40%
AT&T, Inc.
4.22%
The Southern Co.
3.93%
Diversification
REM
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 765 total
33.63%
ZWU
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 30 total
48.25%
Characteristics
Compare
REM
ZWU
| Provider | Purpose Investments | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 4.92% | 7.50% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | March 23, 2017 | October 27, 2011 |
Frequently asked questions about REM and ZWU
Which ETF has performed better year to date: REM or ZWU?
As of September 17, 2026, REM has returned 25.64% year to date, while ZWU has returned 6.05%. REM is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: REM or ZWU?
As of September 17, 2026, REM manages $26.04 M in assets, while ZWU manages $2.16 B. ZWU is the larger fund by AUM.
How are REM and ZWU managed?
REM is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index. ZWU is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index.
What sectors do REM and ZWU emphasize?
REM is most exposed to Finance, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Technology. ZWU is most exposed to Utilities, Energy, and Telecommunications.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: REM or ZWU?
Year to date, REM has seen +$6.31 M in net flows, compared with +$188.41 M for ZWU. ZWU has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of REM and ZWU compare?
REM has an expense ratio of 1.31%, while ZWU has an expense ratio of 0.71%.
What are the top holdings of REM and ZWU?
REM's largest holdings include Petróleo Brasileiro SA and United Microelectronics Corp.. ZWU's top holdings include Fortis, Inc., Hydro One Ltd., and TC Energy Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: REM or ZWU?
REM holds 741 securities, while ZWU holds 30. On holdings count, REM is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about REM and ZWU
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.