VS
When evaluating costs, RGBM features a management fee (MER) of 0.85%, compared to 0.55% for ZUT. Performance-wise, RGBM has returned 16.78% year-to-date with -$1 M in net flows, whereas ZUT is at 22.01% with -$126 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
RGBM
ZUT
| AuM | $32.52 M | $852.91 M |
| Management Fees | 0.85% | 0.55% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.85% | 0.61% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.85% |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RGBM | +0.49% | +3.54% | +16.78% | +29.27% | - |
ZUT | +1.71% | +5.71% | +22.01% | +27.22% | +54.59% | |
| Flows | RGBM | +$0 M | +$1 M | -$1 M | -$1 M | - |
ZUT | -$60 M | -$66 M | -$126 M | -$42 M | +$188 M |
RGBM vs ZUT exposure
Countries
RGBM
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Canada
83.77%
Bermuda
16.23%
Sectors
RGBM
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Utilities
84.34%
Energy
8.20%
Industrials
7.46%
As of July 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
RGBM
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Boralex, Inc.
9.57%
Brookfield Renewable Partners LP
8.77%
AltaGas Ltd.
8.20%
Capital Power Corp.
8.05%
TransAlta Corp.
7.83%
Northland Power, Inc.
7.73%
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP
7.46%
Canadian Utilities Ltd.
7.33%
ATCO Ltd.
7.25%
Emera, Inc.
7.16%
Diversification
RGBM
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 13 total
79.35%
Characteristics
Compare
RGBM
ZUT
| Provider | Return Stacked ETFs | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity, Fixed Income | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Capitalization | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 2.72% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 3, 2025 | January 19, 2010 |
Frequently asked questions about RGBM and ZUT
Which ETF has performed better year to date: RGBM or ZUT?
As of July 16, 2026, RGBM has returned 16.78% year to date, while ZUT has returned 22.01%. ZUT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: RGBM or ZUT?
As of July 16, 2026, RGBM manages $32.52 M in assets, while ZUT manages $852.91 M. ZUT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are RGBM and ZUT managed?
RGBM is actively managed by Return Stacked ETFs. It does not track an index. ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: RGBM or ZUT?
Year to date, RGBM has seen -$0.75 M in net flows, compared with -$125.69 M for ZUT. RGBM has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of RGBM and ZUT compare?
RGBM has an expense ratio of 0.85%, while ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.
Recent articles about RGBM and ZUT
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.