VS
When evaluating costs, RGQO features a management fee (MER) of 0.15%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Performance-wise, RGQO has returned 0.96% year-to-date with +$16 M in net flows, whereas HBNK is at 23.94% with -$413 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
RGQO
HBNK
| AuM | $101.99 M | $784.52 M |
| Management Fees | 0.15% | 0.09% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.17% | 0.10% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.41% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RGQO | +0.21% | +0.58% | +0.96% | +2.57% | +13.00% |
HBNK | +7.80% | +20.31% | +23.94% | +66.64% | - | |
| Flows | RGQO | +$0 M | +$25 M | +$16 M | +$18 M | +$88 M |
HBNK | +$35 M | -$180 M | -$413 M | -$665 M | - |
RGQO vs HBNK exposure
Countries
RGQO
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Canada
99.93%
Sectors
RGQO
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Financials
99.93%
As of June 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
RGQO
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
CDN IMPERIAL BK
17.03%
TORONTO DOMINION
16.96%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.65%
ROYAL BK CANADA
16.56%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.46%
BNS
16.27%
Diversification
RGQO
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.93%
Characteristics
Compare
RGQO
HBNK
| Provider | RBC Global Asset Management | Global X |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.36% | 2.70% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | April 21, 2023 | July 5, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about RGQO and HBNK
Which ETF has performed better year to date: RGQO or HBNK?
As of June 11, 2026, RGQO has returned 0.96% year to date, while HBNK has returned 23.94%. HBNK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: RGQO or HBNK?
As of June 11, 2026, RGQO manages $101.99 M in assets, while HBNK manages $784.52 M. HBNK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are RGQO and HBNK managed?
RGQO is actively managed by RBC Global Asset Management. It does not track an index. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: RGQO or HBNK?
Year to date, RGQO has seen +$15.63 M in net flows, compared with -$412.69 M for HBNK. RGQO has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of RGQO and HBNK compare?
RGQO has an expense ratio of 0.17%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.
Recent articles about RGQO and HBNK
Bank Stocks: An Undervalued Gem?
Bank stocks are poised for growth amid declining inflation and rate cuts.
Posted on 7/29/2024 by ETF Market Canada inBanks
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.