VS
When evaluating costs, RGQR features a management fee (MER) of 0.15%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Performance-wise, RGQR has returned 0.99% year-to-date with +$24 M in net flows, whereas HBNK is at 23.94% with -$413 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
RGQR
HBNK
| AuM | $89.28 M | $784.52 M |
| Management Fees | 0.15% | 0.09% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.17% | 0.10% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.41% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RGQR | +0.69% | +0.71% | +0.99% | +2.92% | +14.20% |
HBNK | +7.80% | +20.31% | +23.94% | +66.64% | - | |
| Flows | RGQR | +$3 M | +$23 M | +$24 M | +$13 M | +$83 M |
HBNK | +$35 M | -$180 M | -$413 M | -$665 M | - |
RGQR vs HBNK exposure
Countries
RGQR
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Canada
99.93%
Sectors
RGQR
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Financials
99.93%
As of June 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
RGQR
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
CDN IMPERIAL BK
17.03%
TORONTO DOMINION
16.96%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.65%
ROYAL BK CANADA
16.56%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.46%
BNS
16.27%
Diversification
RGQR
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.93%
Characteristics
Compare
RGQR
HBNK
| Provider | RBC Global Asset Management | Global X |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.86% | 2.70% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | April 21, 2023 | July 5, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about RGQR and HBNK
Which ETF has performed better year to date: RGQR or HBNK?
As of June 11, 2026, RGQR has returned 0.99% year to date, while HBNK has returned 23.94%. HBNK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: RGQR or HBNK?
As of June 11, 2026, RGQR manages $89.28 M in assets, while HBNK manages $784.52 M. HBNK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are RGQR and HBNK managed?
RGQR is actively managed by RBC Global Asset Management. It does not track an index. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: RGQR or HBNK?
Year to date, RGQR has seen +$24.21 M in net flows, compared with -$412.69 M for HBNK. RGQR has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of RGQR and HBNK compare?
RGQR has an expense ratio of 0.17%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.
Recent articles about RGQR and HBNK
Bank Stocks: An Undervalued Gem?
Bank stocks are poised for growth amid declining inflation and rate cuts.
Posted on 7/29/2024 by ETF Market Canada inBanks
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.