RGQS
RBC Target 2030 Canadian Government Bond ETF

Full RGQS fund page
VS
ZEB
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF

Full ZEB fund page

RBC Target 2030 Canadian Government Bond ETF (RGQS) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that RGQS focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Municipal, Sovereign, and Government agencies, while ZEB leans towards Finance. When evaluating costs, RGQS features a management fee (MER) of 0.15%, compared to 0.25% for ZEB. Performance-wise, RGQS has returned 1.05% year-to-date with +$7 M in net flows, whereas ZEB is at 33.28% with +$186 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0.01.02.03.04.05.0%Jun 22Jun 29Jul 7Jul 14Jul 21

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of July 21, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
RGQS
+0.00%+0.62%+1.05%+3.22%-
ZEB
+2.46%+18.34%+33.28%+68.03%+148.95%
Flows
RGQS
-$6 M-$2 M+$7 M+$36 M-
ZEB
+$949 M+$1,224 M+$186 M+$871 M-$394 M

RGQS vs ZEB exposure

Countries

RGQS
Canada
86.69%
Other
13.31%
ZEB
Canada
100.00%

Sectors

RGQS
Municipal
42.96%
Sovereign
29.24%
Other
13.31%
Government agencies
9.52%
ZEB
Finance
100.00%
As of July 21, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

RGQS
Canada, Bond 0.5 1oct2030 10Y
11.70%
Canada, Bonds 2.75% 1mar2030, CAD
10.48%
Province of Quebec, 1.9% 1sep2030, CAD (B127)
9.92%
CMHC, 1.75% 15jun2030, CAD (92)
9.52%
CA135087T388
8.89%
Alberta, 2.05% 1jun2030, CAD
7.57%
Canada, Bond 1.25 1jun2030 10Y
7.06%
Province of Ontario, 1.35% 2dec2030, CAD (DMTN248)
6.93%
Province of Ontario, 2.05% 2jun2030, CAD (DMTN243)
6.19%
British Columbia, 2.2% 18jun2030, CAD (BCCD-40)
5.91%
ZEB
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.42%
Royal Bank of Canada
17.32%
Bank of Montreal
17.15%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.61%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
15.79%
National Bank of Canada
15.70%

Diversification

RGQS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 19 total
84.16%
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%

Characteristics

Compare
RGQS
ZEB
ProviderRBC Global Asset ManagementBMO
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassFixed IncomeEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield1.83%2.28%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateApril 24, 2024October 20, 2009

Frequently asked questions about RGQS and ZEB

Which ETF has performed better year to date: RGQS or ZEB?
As of July 21, 2026, RGQS has returned 1.05% year to date, while ZEB has returned 33.28%. ZEB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: RGQS or ZEB?
As of July 21, 2026, RGQS manages $106.98 M in assets, while ZEB manages $7.27 B. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are RGQS and ZEB managed?
RGQS is actively managed by RBC Global Asset Management. It does not track an index. ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do RGQS and ZEB emphasize?
RGQS is most exposed to Municipal, Sovereign, and Government agencies. ZEB is most exposed to Finance.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: RGQS or ZEB?
Year to date, RGQS has seen +$7.38 M in net flows, compared with +$186.29 M for ZEB. ZEB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of RGQS and ZEB compare?
RGQS has an expense ratio of 0.17%, while ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What are the top holdings of RGQS and ZEB?
RGQS's largest holdings include Canada, Bond 0.5 1oct2030 10Y and Canada, Bonds 2.75% 1mar2030, CAD. ZEB's top holdings include The Toronto-Dominion Bank, Royal Bank of Canada, and Bank of Montreal.
Which ETF is more diversified: RGQS or ZEB?
RGQS holds 18 securities, while ZEB holds 6. On holdings count, RGQS is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about RGQS and ZEB

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds