RID
RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders ETF

Full RID fund page
VS
RIDH
RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders ETF

Full RIDH fund page

Compare RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders ETF (RID) vs RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders ETF (RIDH) to find the best fit for your portfolio. RID and RIDH provide the same top sector exposures: Finance, Technology, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, RID features a management fee (MER) of 0.49%, compared to 0.49% for RIDH. Performance-wise, RID has returned 18.16% year-to-date with +$219 M in net flows, whereas RIDH is at 17.03% with +$60 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-2.0-1.5-1.0-0.50.00.5%Aug 17Aug 24Aug 31Sep 8Sep 15

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of September 15, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
RID
-1.62%+2.51%+18.16%+26.79%+90.91%
RIDH
-2.17%+2.77%+17.03%+28.48%+80.38%
Flows
RID
+$23 M+$55 M+$219 M+$277 M+$366 M
RIDH
+$3 M+$8 M+$60 M+$63 M+$85 M

RID vs RIDH exposure

Countries

RID
Japan
21.61%
United Kingdom
12.87%
Switzerland
8.90%
France
8.25%
Netherlands
8.20%
Germany
7.10%
Other
33.08%
RIDH
Japan
21.61%
United Kingdom
12.87%
Switzerland
8.90%
France
8.25%
Netherlands
8.20%
Germany
7.10%
Other
33.08%

Sectors

RID
Finance
28.39%
Technology
15.40%
Industrials
13.97%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.53%
Healthcare
7.13%
Other
25.59%
RIDH
Finance
28.39%
Technology
15.40%
Industrials
13.97%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.53%
Healthcare
7.13%
Other
25.59%
As of September 15, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

RID
ASML Holding NV
3.82%
Unilever Plc
3.51%
Intesa Sanpaolo SpA
3.37%
ING Groep NV
3.25%
Roche Holding AG
2.77%
Naturgy Energy Group SA
2.75%
Danske Bank A/S
2.68%
Telefónica SA
2.50%
BHP Group Ltd.
2.23%
Japan Post Holdings Co., Ltd.
2.05%
RIDH
ASML Holding NV
3.82%
Unilever Plc
3.51%
Intesa Sanpaolo SpA
3.37%
ING Groep NV
3.25%
Roche Holding AG
2.77%
Naturgy Energy Group SA
2.75%
Danske Bank A/S
2.68%
Telefónica SA
2.50%
BHP Group Ltd.
2.23%
Japan Post Holdings Co., Ltd.
2.05%

Diversification

RID
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 105 total
28.94%
RIDH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 105 total
28.94%

Characteristics

Compare
RID
RIDH
ProviderRBC Global Asset ManagementRBC Global Asset Management
ManagementActively managedActively managed
Benchmark--
Replication Method
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield2.87%3.10%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJanuary 15, 2014October 22, 2014

Frequently asked questions about RID and RIDH

Which ETF has performed better year to date: RID or RIDH?
As of September 15, 2026, RID has returned 18.16% year to date, while RIDH has returned 17.03%. RID is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: RID or RIDH?
As of September 15, 2026, RID manages $589.81 M in assets, while RIDH manages $161.05 M. RID is the larger fund by AUM.
How are RID and RIDH managed?
RID is actively managed by RBC Global Asset Management. It does not track an index. RIDH is actively managed by RBC Global Asset Management. It does not track an index.
What sectors do RID and RIDH emphasize?
RID is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Industrials. RIDH is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: RID or RIDH?
Year to date, RID has seen +$218.53 M in net flows, compared with +$59.85 M for RIDH. RID has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of RID and RIDH compare?
RID has an expense ratio of 0.54%, while RIDH has an expense ratio of 0.54%.
What are the top holdings of RID and RIDH?
RID's largest holdings include ASML Holding NV, Unilever Plc, and Intesa Sanpaolo SpA. RIDH's top holdings include ASML Holding NV, Unilever Plc, and Intesa Sanpaolo SpA.
Which ETF is more diversified: RID or RIDH?
RID holds 105 securities, while RIDH holds 105. On holdings count, RID is the more diversified portfolio.
CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds