VS
When evaluating costs, RNAG features a management fee (MER) of 0.6%, compared to 0.28% for VIDY. Performance-wise, RNAG has returned 13.18% year-to-date with +$5 M in net flows, whereas VIDY is at 19.59% with +$940 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
RNAG
VIDY
| AuM | $12.83 M | $2,343.73 M |
| Management Fees | 0.60% | 0.28% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.77% | 0.32% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.11% |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 9, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RNAG | -1.54% | -1.44% | +13.18% | +14.66% | +81.34% |
VIDY | +2.63% | -0.53% | +19.59% | +23.59% | +95.73% | |
| Flows | RNAG | +$0 M | +$1 M | +$5 M | +$8 M | +$9 M |
VIDY | +$49 M | +$176 M | +$940 M | +$1,108 M | +$1,831 M |
RNAG vs VIDY exposure
Countries
RNAG
Exposure data will be available soon
VIDY
Japan
17.16%
United Kingdom
15.54%
Switzerland
10.62%
Australia
10.55%
France
7.49%
Other
38.64%
Sectors
RNAG
Exposure data will be available soon
VIDY
Finance
44.23%
Healthcare
9.00%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.46%
Energy
7.22%
Other
31.10%
As of November 9, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
RNAG
Exposure data will be available soon
VIDY
HSBC Holdings Plc
2.73%
Roche Holding AG
2.35%
Shell Plc
2.22%
Novartis AG
2.15%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
2.05%
Nestlé SA
1.88%
BHP Group Ltd.
1.72%
Banco Santander SA
1.62%
Toyota Motor Corp.
1.56%
Allianz SE
1.44%
Diversification
RNAG
Exposure data will be available soon
VIDY
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 595 total
19.72%
Characteristics
Compare
RNAG
VIDY
| Provider | RBC Global Asset Management | Vanguard |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | FTSE Developed ex North America High Dividend Yield Net Tax Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | - | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.44% | 2.86% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | March 8, 2023 | August 21, 2018 |
Frequently asked questions about RNAG and VIDY
Which ETF has performed better year to date: RNAG or VIDY?
As of November 9, 2026, RNAG has returned 13.18% year to date, while VIDY has returned 19.59%. VIDY is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: RNAG or VIDY?
As of November 9, 2026, RNAG manages $12.83 M in assets, while VIDY manages $2.34 B. VIDY is the larger fund by AUM.
How are RNAG and VIDY managed?
RNAG is actively managed by RBC Global Asset Management. It does not track an index. VIDY is passively managed by Vanguard. It tracks the FTSE Developed ex North America High Dividend Yield Net Tax Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: RNAG or VIDY?
Year to date, RNAG has seen +$4.93 M in net flows, compared with +$939.53 M for VIDY. VIDY has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of RNAG and VIDY compare?
RNAG has an expense ratio of 0.77%, while VIDY has an expense ratio of 0.32%.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.