VS
When evaluating costs, RNAG features a management fee (MER) of 0.6%, compared to 0.5% for XIN. Performance-wise, RNAG has returned 10.91% year-to-date with +$5 M in net flows, whereas XIN is at 10.32% with +$122 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
RNAG
XIN
| AuM | $12.57 M | $1,879.79 M |
| Management Fees | 0.60% | 0.50% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.77% | 0.48% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -1.14% |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 6, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RNAG | -3.41% | -2.91% | +10.91% | +13.62% | +77.79% |
XIN | -1.98% | -3.43% | +10.32% | +13.32% | +57.59% | |
| Flows | RNAG | +$0 M | +$1 M | +$5 M | +$8 M | +$9 M |
XIN | -$6 M | -$14 M | +$122 M | +$129 M | +$86 M |
RNAG vs XIN exposure
Countries
RNAG
Exposure data will be available soon
XIN
Japan
24.69%
United Kingdom
13.72%
Switzerland
9.56%
Germany
8.47%
France
8.36%
Other
35.20%
Sectors
RNAG
Exposure data will be available soon
XIN
Finance
27.54%
Industrials
15.69%
Technology
13.59%
Healthcare
9.59%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.83%
Other
25.76%
As of November 6, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
RNAG
Exposure data will be available soon
XIN
US4642874659
99.94%
Diversification
RNAG
Exposure data will be available soon
XIN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 658 total
99.94%
Characteristics
Compare
RNAG
XIN
| Provider | RBC Global Asset Management | iShares |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | MSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | - | Other |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.45% | 2.81% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | March 8, 2023 | September 6, 2011 |
Frequently asked questions about RNAG and XIN
Which ETF has performed better year to date: RNAG or XIN?
As of November 6, 2026, RNAG has returned 10.91% year to date, while XIN has returned 10.32%. RNAG is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: RNAG or XIN?
As of November 6, 2026, RNAG manages $12.57 M in assets, while XIN manages $1.88 B. XIN is the larger fund by AUM.
How are RNAG and XIN managed?
RNAG is actively managed by RBC Global Asset Management. It does not track an index. XIN is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: RNAG or XIN?
Year to date, RNAG has seen +$4.93 M in net flows, compared with +$121.62 M for XIN. XIN has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of RNAG and XIN compare?
RNAG has an expense ratio of 0.77%, while XIN has an expense ratio of 0.48%.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.