VS
When evaluating costs, RPS features a management fee (MER) of 0.75%, compared to 0.58% for DXP. Performance-wise, RPS has returned 6.04% year-to-date with -$6 M in net flows, whereas DXP is at 2.11% with +$42 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
RPS
DXP
| AuM | $38.47 M | $641.95 M |
| Management Fees | 0.75% | 0.58% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.93% | 0.65% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RPS | +0.01% | +0.58% | +6.04% | +9.69% | +65.06% |
DXP | -0.39% | -1.27% | +2.11% | +4.12% | +43.96% | |
| Flows | RPS | -$0 M | -$0 M | -$6 M | -$9 M | -$8 M |
DXP | +$5 M | +$17 M | +$42 M | +$60 M | -$66 M |
RPS vs DXP exposure
Countries
RPS
Exposure data will be available soon
DXP
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
RPS
Exposure data will be available soon
DXP
Exposure data will be available soon
As of October 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
RPS
Exposure data will be available soon
DXP
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
RPS
Exposure data will be available soon
DXP
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
RPS
DXP
| Provider | Purpose Investments | Dynamic Funds |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 4.04% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | December 22, 2016 | January 20, 2017 |
Frequently asked questions about RPS and DXP
Which ETF has performed better year to date: RPS or DXP?
As of October 16, 2026, RPS has returned 6.04% year to date, while DXP has returned 2.11%. RPS is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: RPS or DXP?
As of October 16, 2026, RPS manages $38.47 M in assets, while DXP manages $641.95 M. DXP is the larger fund by AUM.
How are RPS and DXP managed?
RPS is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index. DXP is actively managed by Dynamic Funds. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: RPS or DXP?
Year to date, RPS has seen -$6.41 M in net flows, compared with +$42.37 M for DXP. DXP has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of RPS and DXP compare?
RPS has an expense ratio of 0.93%, while DXP has an expense ratio of 0.65%.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.