VS
When evaluating costs, RPS features a management fee (MER) of 0.75%, compared to 0.53% for RPF. Performance-wise, RPS has returned 5.95% year-to-date with -$6 M in net flows, whereas RPF is at 9.13% with -$28 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
RPS
RPF
| AuM | $38.44 M | $638.48 M |
| Management Fees | 0.75% | 0.53% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.93% | 0.58% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 19, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RPS | -0.17% | -0.06% | +5.95% | +9.39% | +65.63% |
RPF | +0.06% | +0.28% | +9.13% | +14.13% | +82.08% | |
| Flows | RPS | +$0 M | -$0 M | -$6 M | -$9 M | -$8 M |
RPF | -$13 M | -$8 M | -$28 M | -$23 M | -$101 M |
RPS vs RPF exposure
Countries
RPS
Exposure data will be available soon
RPF
Canada
95.92%
Sectors
RPS
Exposure data will be available soon
RPF
Finance
43.97%
Energy
23.71%
Utilities
20.38%
Telecommunications
9.39%
As of October 19, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
RPS
Exposure data will be available soon
RPF
BCE, Inc.
3.07%
Brookfield Office Properties, Inc.
2.92%
Brookfield Office Properties, Inc.
2.59%
TransAlta Corp.
2.39%
Enbridge, Inc.
1.99%
Brookfield Corp.
1.98%
Brookfield Office Properties, Inc.
1.90%
TC Energy Corp.
1.79%
TC Energy Corp.
1.78%
TransAlta Corp.
1.68%
Diversification
RPS
Exposure data will be available soon
RPF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 120 total
22.08%
Characteristics
Compare
RPS
RPF
| Provider | Purpose Investments | RBC Global Asset Management |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 4.04% | 4.85% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | December 22, 2016 | September 20, 2016 |
Frequently asked questions about RPS and RPF
Which ETF has performed better year to date: RPS or RPF?
As of October 19, 2026, RPS has returned 5.95% year to date, while RPF has returned 9.13%. RPF is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: RPS or RPF?
As of October 19, 2026, RPS manages $38.44 M in assets, while RPF manages $638.48 M. RPF is the larger fund by AUM.
How are RPS and RPF managed?
RPS is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index. RPF is actively managed by RBC Global Asset Management. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: RPS or RPF?
Year to date, RPS has seen -$6.40 M in net flows, compared with -$27.89 M for RPF. RPS has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of RPS and RPF compare?
RPS has an expense ratio of 0.93%, while RPF has an expense ratio of 0.58%.
Recent articles about RPS and RPF
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.