VS
When evaluating costs, RPS features a management fee (MER) of 0.75%, compared to 0.51% for TPRF. Performance-wise, RPS has returned 6.04% year-to-date with -$6 M in net flows, whereas TPRF is at 7.62% with +$103 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
RPS
TPRF
| AuM | $38.47 M | $504.77 M |
| Management Fees | 0.75% | 0.51% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.93% | 0.50% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RPS | +0.01% | +0.58% | +6.04% | +9.69% | +65.06% |
TPRF | +0.16% | +0.54% | +7.62% | +11.68% | +75.38% | |
| Flows | RPS | -$0 M | -$0 M | -$6 M | -$9 M | -$8 M |
TPRF | +$4 M | +$43 M | +$103 M | +$109 M | +$159 M |
RPS vs TPRF exposure
Countries
RPS
Exposure data will be available soon
TPRF
Canada
97.02%
Sectors
RPS
Exposure data will be available soon
TPRF
Finance
45.25%
Energy
25.80%
Utilities
16.57%
Telecommunications
8.79%
As of October 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
RPS
Exposure data will be available soon
TPRF
Fortis, Inc.
2.98%
Manulife Financial Corp.
2.80%
TC Energy Corp.
2.63%
TC Energy Corp.
2.46%
Brookfield Renewable Power Preferred Equity, Inc.
2.27%
Pembina Pipeline Corp.
2.25%
Brookfield Office Properties, Inc.
2.24%
BCE, Inc.
2.12%
BCE, Inc.
2.11%
Enbridge, Inc.
2.02%
Diversification
RPS
Exposure data will be available soon
TPRF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 121 total
23.90%
Characteristics
Compare
RPS
TPRF
| Provider | Purpose Investments | TD Asset Management |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 4.04% | 4.12% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | December 22, 2016 | November 14, 2018 |
Frequently asked questions about RPS and TPRF
Which ETF has performed better year to date: RPS or TPRF?
As of October 16, 2026, RPS has returned 6.04% year to date, while TPRF has returned 7.62%. TPRF is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: RPS or TPRF?
As of October 16, 2026, RPS manages $38.47 M in assets, while TPRF manages $504.77 M. TPRF is the larger fund by AUM.
How are RPS and TPRF managed?
RPS is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index. TPRF is actively managed by TD Asset Management. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: RPS or TPRF?
Year to date, RPS has seen -$6.41 M in net flows, compared with +$102.56 M for TPRF. TPRF has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of RPS and TPRF compare?
RPS has an expense ratio of 0.93%, while TPRF has an expense ratio of 0.50%.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.