VS
When evaluating costs, RQQ features a management fee (MER) of 0.2%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Performance-wise, RQQ has returned 1.11% year-to-date with +$28 M in net flows, whereas HBNK is at 23.94% with -$413 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
RQQ
HBNK
| AuM | $676.92 M | $784.52 M |
| Management Fees | 0.20% | 0.09% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.22% | 0.10% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.41% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RQQ | +0.63% | +0.84% | +1.11% | +3.49% | +19.75% |
HBNK | +7.80% | +20.31% | +23.94% | +66.64% | - | |
| Flows | RQQ | +$9 M | +$11 M | +$28 M | +$124 M | +$561 M |
HBNK | +$35 M | -$180 M | -$413 M | -$665 M | - |
RQQ vs HBNK exposure
Countries
RQQ
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Canada
99.93%
Sectors
RQQ
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Financials
99.93%
As of June 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
RQQ
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
CDN IMPERIAL BK
17.03%
TORONTO DOMINION
16.96%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.65%
ROYAL BK CANADA
16.56%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.46%
BNS
16.27%
Diversification
RQQ
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.93%
Characteristics
Compare
RQQ
HBNK
| Provider | RBC Global Asset Management | Global X |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | FTSE Canada 2028 Maturity Corporate Bond Index - CAD | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 4.05% | 2.70% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | October 20, 2022 | July 5, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about RQQ and HBNK
Which ETF has performed better year to date: RQQ or HBNK?
As of June 11, 2026, RQQ has returned 1.11% year to date, while HBNK has returned 23.94%. HBNK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: RQQ or HBNK?
As of June 11, 2026, RQQ manages $676.92 M in assets, while HBNK manages $784.52 M. HBNK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are RQQ and HBNK managed?
RQQ is passively managed by RBC Global Asset Management. It tracks the FTSE Canada 2028 Maturity Corporate Bond Index - CAD benchmark. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: RQQ or HBNK?
Year to date, RQQ has seen +$27.52 M in net flows, compared with -$412.69 M for HBNK. RQQ has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of RQQ and HBNK compare?
RQQ has an expense ratio of 0.22%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.
Recent articles about RQQ and HBNK
Bank Stocks: An Undervalued Gem?
Bank stocks are poised for growth amid declining inflation and rate cuts.
Posted on 7/29/2024 by ETF Market Canada inBanks
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.