VS
When evaluating costs, RQQ features a management fee (MER) of 0.2%, compared to 0.25% for ZEB. Performance-wise, RQQ has returned 1.11% year-to-date with +$28 M in net flows, whereas ZEB is at 23.88% with -$1,116 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
RQQ
ZEB
| AuM | $676.92 M | $5,536.30 M |
| Management Fees | 0.20% | 0.25% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.22% | 0.28% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.62% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RQQ | +0.63% | +0.84% | +1.11% | +3.49% | +19.75% |
ZEB | +7.80% | +20.31% | +23.88% | +66.43% | +145.04% | |
| Flows | RQQ | +$9 M | +$11 M | +$28 M | +$124 M | +$561 M |
ZEB | -$85 M | -$309 M | -$1,116 M | -$946 M | -$1,896 M |
RQQ vs ZEB exposure
Countries
RQQ
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Canada
100.00%
Sectors
RQQ
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Financials
100.00%
As of June 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
RQQ
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
TORONTO DOMINION
17.02%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
16.89%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.73%
ROYAL BK CANADA
16.71%
BNS
16.37%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.28%
Diversification
RQQ
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
Characteristics
Compare
RQQ
ZEB
| Provider | RBC Global Asset Management | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | FTSE Canada 2028 Maturity Corporate Bond Index - CAD | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 4.05% | 2.44% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | October 20, 2022 | October 20, 2009 |
Frequently asked questions about RQQ and ZEB
Which ETF has performed better year to date: RQQ or ZEB?
As of June 11, 2026, RQQ has returned 1.11% year to date, while ZEB has returned 23.88%. ZEB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: RQQ or ZEB?
As of June 11, 2026, RQQ manages $676.92 M in assets, while ZEB manages $5.54 B. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are RQQ and ZEB managed?
RQQ is passively managed by RBC Global Asset Management. It tracks the FTSE Canada 2028 Maturity Corporate Bond Index - CAD benchmark. ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: RQQ or ZEB?
Year to date, RQQ has seen +$27.52 M in net flows, compared with -$1,115.72 M for ZEB. RQQ has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of RQQ and ZEB compare?
RQQ has an expense ratio of 0.22%, while ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
Recent articles about RQQ and ZEB
Bank Stocks: An Undervalued Gem?
Bank stocks are poised for growth amid declining inflation and rate cuts.
Posted on 7/29/2024 by ETF Market Canada inBanks
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.