RQS
RBC Target 2030 Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF

Full RQS fund page
VS
ZEB
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF

Full ZEB fund page

RBC Target 2030 Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF (RQS) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that RQS focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Insurance and reinsurance, Power, and Pipelines, while ZEB leans towards Finance. When evaluating costs, RQS features a management fee (MER) of 0.2%, compared to 0.25% for ZEB. Performance-wise, RQS has returned 1.25% year-to-date with +$110 M in net flows, whereas ZEB is at 32.65% with +$209 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0.01.02.03.04.05.0%Jun 22Jun 29Jul 7Jul 14

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of July 20, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
RQS
-0.03%+0.47%+1.25%+3.88%-
ZEB
+1.98%+16.51%+32.65%+67.24%+148.29%
Flows
RQS
+$17 M+$52 M+$110 M+$189 M-
ZEB
+$972 M+$1,234 M+$209 M+$894 M-$431 M

RQS vs ZEB exposure

Countries

RQS
Other
61.34%
Canada
38.65%
ZEB
Canada
100.00%

Sectors

RQS
Other
61.34%
Insurance and reinsurance
8.41%
Other
30.25%
ZEB
Finance
100.00%
As of July 20, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

RQS
CA779926QX54
6.72%
CA89116C3S44
5.03%
CA06368MRF37
4.99%
CA06418YXB96
4.76%
CA89116CQ341
4.57%
CA13607P5X87
4.24%
CA04686PAE75
4.15%
CA63306AJH01
3.31%
Manulife Financial Corporation, 2.818% 13may2035, CAD
3.21%
TransCanada PipeLines, 5.277% 15jul2030, CAD
3.13%
ZEB
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.42%
Royal Bank of Canada
17.32%
Bank of Montreal
17.15%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.61%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
15.79%
National Bank of Canada
15.70%

Diversification

RQS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 42 total
44.12%
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%

Characteristics

Compare
RQS
ZEB
ProviderRBC Global Asset ManagementBMO
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkFTSE Canada 2030 Maturity Corporate Bond Index - CADSolactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassFixed IncomeEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield3.71%2.29%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateApril 24, 2024October 20, 2009

Frequently asked questions about RQS and ZEB

Which ETF has performed better year to date: RQS or ZEB?
As of July 20, 2026, RQS has returned 1.25% year to date, while ZEB has returned 32.65%. ZEB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: RQS or ZEB?
As of July 20, 2026, RQS manages $418.71 M in assets, while ZEB manages $7.26 B. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are RQS and ZEB managed?
RQS is passively managed by RBC Global Asset Management. It tracks the FTSE Canada 2030 Maturity Corporate Bond Index - CAD benchmark. ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do RQS and ZEB emphasize?
RQS is most exposed to Insurance and reinsurance, Power, and Pipelines. ZEB is most exposed to Finance.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: RQS or ZEB?
Year to date, RQS has seen +$110.50 M in net flows, compared with +$209.29 M for ZEB. ZEB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of RQS and ZEB compare?
RQS has an expense ratio of 0.22%, while ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What are the top holdings of RQS and ZEB?
RQS's largest holdings include Manulife Financial Corporation, 2.818% 13may2035, CAD and TransCanada PipeLines, 5.277% 15jul2030, CAD. ZEB's top holdings include The Toronto-Dominion Bank, Royal Bank of Canada, and Bank of Montreal.
Which ETF is more diversified: RQS or ZEB?
RQS holds 21 securities, while ZEB holds 6. On holdings count, RQS is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about RQS and ZEB

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds