RQS
RBC Target 2030 Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF

Full RQS fund page
VS
ZSP
BMO S&P 500 Index ETF

Full ZSP fund page

When evaluating costs, RQS features a management fee (MER) of 0.2%, compared to 0.08% for ZSP. Performance-wise, RQS has returned 1.22% year-to-date with +$110 M in net flows, whereas ZSP is at 11.75% with +$285 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-1.00.01.02.03.0%Jun 17Jun 24Jul 2Jul 9Jul 16

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of July 17, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
RQS
-0.09%+0.48%+1.22%+4.13%-
ZSP
-0.20%+7.33%+11.75%+21.86%+80.75%
Flows
RQS
+$17 M+$52 M+$110 M+$189 M-
ZSP
-$338 M+$44 M+$285 M+$842 M+$4,796 M

RQS vs ZSP exposure

Countries

RQS
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
USA
97.86%

Sectors

RQS
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Technology
46.52%
Finance
12.65%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.38%
Healthcare
8.23%
Industrials
7.68%
Other
15.54%
As of July 17, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

RQS
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
NVIDIA Corp.
8.04%
Apple, Inc.
7.08%
Microsoft Corp.
4.89%
Amazon.com, Inc.
4.14%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.51%
Broadcom Inc.
3.12%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.79%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.15%
Tesla, Inc.
1.92%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.61%

Diversification

RQS
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 502 total
39.24%

Characteristics

Compare
RQS
ZSP
ProviderRBC Global Asset ManagementBMO
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkFTSE Canada 2030 Maturity Corporate Bond Index - CADS&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassFixed IncomeEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield3.71%0.77%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateApril 24, 2024November 14, 2012

Frequently asked questions about RQS and ZSP

Which ETF has performed better year to date: RQS or ZSP?
As of July 17, 2026, RQS has returned 1.22% year to date, while ZSP has returned 11.75%. ZSP is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: RQS or ZSP?
As of July 17, 2026, RQS manages $418.59 M in assets, while ZSP manages $23.77 B. ZSP is the larger fund by AUM.
How are RQS and ZSP managed?
RQS is passively managed by RBC Global Asset Management. It tracks the FTSE Canada 2030 Maturity Corporate Bond Index - CAD benchmark. ZSP is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: RQS or ZSP?
Year to date, RQS has seen +$110.50 M in net flows, compared with +$284.95 M for ZSP. ZSP has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of RQS and ZSP compare?
RQS has an expense ratio of 0.22%, while ZSP has an expense ratio of 0.09%.

Recent articles about RQS and ZSP

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds