RSSX
Global X Russell 2000 Index ETF

Full RSSX fund page
VS
XSMC
iShares S&P U.S. Small-Cap Index ETF

Full XSMC fund page

Compare Global X Russell 2000 Index ETF (RSSX) vs iShares S&P U.S. Small-Cap Index ETF (XSMC) to find the best fit for your portfolio. RSSX provides Finance, Technology, and Healthcare exposures, while XSMC is primarily weighted in Finance, Technology, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, RSSX features a management fee (MER) of 0.25%, compared to 0.2% for XSMC. Performance-wise, RSSX has returned 19.83% year-to-date with +$7 M in net flows, whereas XSMC is at 24.56% with +$11 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0.01.02.03.04.05.06.07.0%Jun 17Jun 24Jul 2Jul 9Jul 16

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of July 17, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
RSSX
+1.50%+6.87%+19.83%+32.53%-
XSMC
+3.72%+10.81%+24.56%+33.02%+57.57%
Flows
RSSX
+$16 M+$17 M+$7 M+$17 M-
XSMC
+$2 M+$6 M+$11 M+$12 M+$43 M

RSSX vs XSMC exposure

Countries

RSSX
USA
92.40%
Other
7.60%
XSMC
USA
99.16%

Sectors

RSSX
Finance
22.23%
Technology
17.26%
Healthcare
15.86%
Industrials
15.47%
Other
29.18%
XSMC
Finance
24.81%
Technology
15.63%
Industrials
12.25%
Healthcare
10.97%
Consumer Cyclicals
7.95%
Other
28.39%
As of July 17, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

RSSX
Bloom Energy Corp.
1.82%
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd.
1.11%
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
0.75%
IonQ, Inc.
0.73%
Fabrinet
0.69%
Nextpower, Inc.
0.67%
Coeur Mining, Inc.
0.58%
TTM Technologies, Inc.
0.52%
EchoStar Corp.
0.51%
Guardant Health, Inc.
0.47%
XSMC
BlackRock Cash Funds - Treasury
1.69%
Sanmina Corp.
0.83%
Semtech Corp.
0.83%
Viavi Solutions, Inc.
0.66%
ViaSat, Inc.
0.64%
Lumen Technologies, Inc. (Louisiana)
0.61%
FormFactor, Inc.
0.57%
Element Solutions, Inc.
0.57%
Argan, Inc.
0.54%
Enphase Energy, Inc.
0.52%

Diversification

RSSX
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1,872 total
7.84%
XSMC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 603 total
7.44%

Characteristics

Compare
RSSX
XSMC
ProviderGlobal XiShares
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkRussell 2000 RIC Capped Index - USDS&P SmallCap 600 Index - USD
Replication Method
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield1.63%0.88%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateNovember 7, 2024September 10, 2019

Frequently asked questions about RSSX and XSMC

Which ETF has performed better year to date: RSSX or XSMC?
As of July 17, 2026, RSSX has returned 19.83% year to date, while XSMC has returned 24.56%. XSMC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: RSSX or XSMC?
As of July 17, 2026, RSSX manages $47.51 M in assets, while XSMC manages $101.07 M. XSMC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are RSSX and XSMC managed?
RSSX is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Russell 2000 RIC Capped Index - USD benchmark. XSMC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Index - USD benchmark.
What sectors do RSSX and XSMC emphasize?
RSSX is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Healthcare. XSMC is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: RSSX or XSMC?
Year to date, RSSX has seen +$7.32 M in net flows, compared with +$10.69 M for XSMC. XSMC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of RSSX and XSMC compare?
RSSX has an expense ratio of 0.28%, while XSMC has an expense ratio of 0.21%.
What are the top holdings of RSSX and XSMC?
RSSX's largest holdings include Bloom Energy Corp., Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd., and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.. XSMC's top holdings include BlackRock Cash Funds - Treasury, Sanmina Corp., and Semtech Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: RSSX or XSMC?
RSSX holds 1866 securities, while XSMC holds 601. On holdings count, RSSX is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about RSSX and XSMC

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds