VS
Compare Global X Russell 2000 Index ETF (RSSX) vs iShares U.S. Small Cap Index ETF (XSU) to find the best fit for your portfolio. RSSX and XSU provide the same top sector exposures: Finance, Technology, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, RSSX features a management fee (MER) of 0.25%, compared to 0.35% for XSU. Performance-wise, RSSX has returned 19.83% year-to-date with +$7 M in net flows, whereas XSU is at 18.46% with -$22 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
RSSX
XSU
| AuM | $47.51 M | $766.18 M |
| Management Fees | 0.25% | 0.35% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.28% | 0.36% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.62% | -0.40% |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 17, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RSSX | +1.50% | +6.87% | +19.83% | +32.53% | - |
XSU | +1.42% | +6.53% | +18.46% | +29.79% | +48.68% | |
| Flows | RSSX | +$16 M | +$17 M | +$7 M | +$17 M | - |
XSU | +$25 M | +$31 M | -$22 M | -$59 M | +$56 M |
RSSX vs XSU exposure
Countries
RSSX
USA
92.40%
Other
7.60%
XSU
USA
93.79%
Sectors
RSSX
Finance
22.23%
Technology
17.26%
Healthcare
15.86%
Industrials
15.47%
Other
29.18%
XSU
Finance
22.30%
Technology
17.65%
Healthcare
16.02%
Industrials
15.61%
Other
28.42%
As of July 17, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
RSSX
Bloom Energy Corp.
1.82%
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd.
1.11%
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
0.75%
IonQ, Inc.
0.73%
Fabrinet
0.69%
Nextpower, Inc.
0.67%
Coeur Mining, Inc.
0.58%
TTM Technologies, Inc.
0.52%
EchoStar Corp.
0.51%
Guardant Health, Inc.
0.47%
XSU
Bloom Energy Corp.
1.82%
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd.
1.11%
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
0.75%
IonQ, Inc.
0.73%
Fabrinet
0.69%
Nextpower, Inc.
0.67%
Coeur Mining, Inc.
0.58%
TTM Technologies, Inc.
0.52%
EchoStar Corp.
0.51%
Guardant Health, Inc.
0.47%
Diversification
RSSX
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1,872 total
7.84%
XSU
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1,902 total
7.84%
Characteristics
Compare
RSSX
XSU
| Provider | Global X | iShares |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Russell 2000 RIC Capped Index - USD | Russell 2000 CAD Hedged NTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.63% | 0.76% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | November 7, 2024 | May 14, 2007 |
Frequently asked questions about RSSX and XSU
Which ETF has performed better year to date: RSSX or XSU?
As of July 17, 2026, RSSX has returned 19.83% year to date, while XSU has returned 18.46%. RSSX is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: RSSX or XSU?
As of July 17, 2026, RSSX manages $47.51 M in assets, while XSU manages $766.18 M. XSU is the larger fund by AUM.
How are RSSX and XSU managed?
RSSX is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Russell 2000 RIC Capped Index - USD benchmark. XSU is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the Russell 2000 CAD Hedged NTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do RSSX and XSU emphasize?
RSSX is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Healthcare. XSU is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: RSSX or XSU?
Year to date, RSSX has seen +$7.32 M in net flows, compared with -$22.15 M for XSU. RSSX has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of RSSX and XSU compare?
RSSX has an expense ratio of 0.28%, while XSU has an expense ratio of 0.36%.
What are the top holdings of RSSX and XSU?
RSSX's largest holdings include Bloom Energy Corp., Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd., and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.. XSU's top holdings include Bloom Energy Corp., Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd., and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: RSSX or XSU?
RSSX holds 1866 securities, while XSU holds 1894. On holdings count, XSU is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about RSSX and XSU
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.