VS
Purpose Tactical Asset Allocation Fund (RTA) and BMO Canadian Core Plus US Balanced ETF (ZBCB) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that RTA focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Finance, Sovereign, and Energy, while ZBCB leans towards Finance, Technology, and Municipal. When evaluating costs, RTA features a management fee (MER) of 0.75%, compared to 0.45% for ZBCB. Performance-wise, RTA has returned 9.28% year-to-date with +$30 M in net flows, whereas ZBCB is at 6.97% with +$3 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
RTA
ZBCB
| AuM | $325.86 M | $10.60 M |
| Management Fees | 0.75% | 0.45% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.91% | 0.45% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RTA | -1.63% | +0.90% | +9.28% | +12.64% | +40.47% |
ZBCB | -1.38% | +0.93% | +6.97% | +10.35% | - | |
| Flows | RTA | +$4 M | +$19 M | +$30 M | +$37 M | +$35 M |
ZBCB | +$2 M | +$2 M | +$3 M | +$7 M | - |
RTA vs ZBCB exposure
Countries
RTA
Canada
58.14%
USA
36.02%
ZBCB
Canada
56.77%
USA
38.49%
Sectors
RTA
Finance
29.96%
Sovereign
25.96%
Energy
9.25%
Other
34.83%
ZBCB
Finance
29.62%
Technology
14.83%
Municipal
12.10%
Energy
10.08%
Other
33.37%
As of September 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
RTA
Royal Bank of Canada
4.44%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
3.04%
Shopify, Inc.
2.17%
Bank of Montreal
1.91%
Enbridge, Inc.
1.81%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
1.65%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
1.64%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
1.49%
Brookfield Corp.
1.38%
Suncor Energy, Inc.
1.20%
ZBCB
Royal Bank of Canada
3.24%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.05%
NVIDIA Corp.
2.50%
Bank of America Corp.
2.44%
Apple, Inc.
2.44%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.91%
Suncor Energy, Inc.
1.90%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
1.83%
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
1.81%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
1.73%
Diversification
RTA
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 4,572 total
20.73%
ZBCB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 16,100 total
22.86%
Characteristics
Compare
RTA
ZBCB
| Provider | Purpose Investments | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity, Fixed Income | Equity, Fixed Income |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 3.62% | 2.04% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 11, 2017 | May 21, 2025 |
Frequently asked questions about RTA and ZBCB
Which ETF has performed better year to date: RTA or ZBCB?
As of September 11, 2026, RTA has returned 9.28% year to date, while ZBCB has returned 6.97%. RTA is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: RTA or ZBCB?
As of September 11, 2026, RTA manages $325.86 M in assets, while ZBCB manages $10.60 M. RTA is the larger fund by AUM.
How are RTA and ZBCB managed?
RTA is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index. ZBCB is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index.
What sectors do RTA and ZBCB emphasize?
RTA is most exposed to Finance, Sovereign, and Energy. ZBCB is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Municipal.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: RTA or ZBCB?
Year to date, RTA has seen +$29.95 M in net flows, compared with +$3.44 M for ZBCB. RTA has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of RTA and ZBCB compare?
RTA has an expense ratio of 0.91%, while ZBCB has an expense ratio of 0.45%.
What are the top holdings of RTA and ZBCB?
RTA's largest holdings include Royal Bank of Canada, The Toronto-Dominion Bank, and Shopify, Inc.. ZBCB's top holdings include Royal Bank of Canada, Alphabet, Inc., and NVIDIA Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: RTA or ZBCB?
RTA holds 4562 securities, while ZBCB holds 6680. On holdings count, ZBCB is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.