RTT
Purpose Tactical Thematic Fund

Full RTT fund page
VS
RCLO
RBC AAA CLO (CAD Hedged) ETF

Full RCLO fund page

Purpose Tactical Thematic Fund (RTT) and RBC AAA CLO (CAD Hedged) ETF (RCLO) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that RTT focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Consumer Cyclicals, and Consumer Services, while RCLO leans towards Industrials. When evaluating costs, RTT features a management fee (MER) of 0.5%, compared to 0.39% for RCLO. Performance-wise, RTT has returned 13.63% year-to-date with +$0 M in net flows, whereas RCLO is at 2.8% with +$22 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-6.0-5.0-4.0-3.0-2.0-1.00.01.0%Sep 21Sep 28Oct 5Oct 12Oct 19

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of October 19, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
RTT
-5.44%-1.27%+13.63%+7.01%+48.46%
RCLO
+0.18%+0.81%+2.80%+3.48%-
Flows
RTT
+$0 M+$0 M+$0 M+$0 M+$2 M
RCLO
+$3 M+$5 M+$22 M+$33 M-

RTT vs RCLO exposure

Countries

RTT
Other
79.00%
Other
21.00%
RCLO
Other
96.76%

Sectors

RTT
Other
79.00%
Technology
17.71%
RCLO
Other
96.76%
As of October 19, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

RTT
US37954Y8710
20.44%
US37954Y6326
20.01%
US37954Y6730
19.19%
CA74642C3003
10.39%
CA74642X1069
8.13%
Nintendo Co., Ltd.
1.77%
NetEase, Inc.
1.58%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
1.55%
Unity Software, Inc.
1.48%
Bandai Namco Holdings, Inc.
1.40%
RCLO
USG6463GAL89
6.65%
USG7089UAM74
5.87%
USG2850PAH76
4.83%
USG5279JAF15
4.50%
USG3038PAU15
4.16%
USG6000NAF62
4.16%
USG72014AL00
4.16%
USG37939AA65
4.16%
USG6S34PAJ38
3.83%
USG2627NAA93
3.52%

Diversification

RTT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 30 total
85.94%
RCLO
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 22 total
45.85%

Characteristics

Compare
RTT
RCLO
ProviderPurpose InvestmentsRBC Global Asset Management
ManagementActively managedActively managed
Benchmark--
Replication Method--
Asset ClassEquityFixed Income
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield5.96%4.89%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateOctober 19, 2023April 25, 2025

Frequently asked questions about RTT and RCLO

Which ETF has performed better year to date: RTT or RCLO?
As of October 19, 2026, RTT has returned 13.63% year to date, while RCLO has returned 2.80%. RTT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: RTT or RCLO?
As of October 19, 2026, RTT manages $4.05 M in assets, while RCLO manages $83.58 M. RCLO is the larger fund by AUM.
How are RTT and RCLO managed?
RTT is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index. RCLO is actively managed by RBC Global Asset Management. It does not track an index.
What sectors do RTT and RCLO emphasize?
RTT is most exposed to Technology, Consumer Cyclicals, and Consumer Services. RCLO is most exposed to Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: RTT or RCLO?
Year to date, RTT has seen +$0.00 M in net flows, compared with +$21.73 M for RCLO. RCLO has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of RTT and RCLO compare?
RTT has an expense ratio of 1.04%, while RCLO has an expense ratio of 0.33%.
What are the top holdings of RTT and RCLO?
RTT's largest holdings include Nintendo Co., Ltd. and NetEase, Inc.. RCLO's top holdings include Apidos CLO 2021-37, FRN 22oct2034, USD (ABS, A).
Which ETF is more diversified: RTT or RCLO?
RTT holds 25 securities, while RCLO holds 2. On holdings count, RTT is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about RTT and RCLO

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds