Purpose Tactical Thematic Fund (RTT) and BMO BBB CLO ETF (ZBBZ.U) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that RTT focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Consumer Cyclicals, and Consumer Services, while ZBBZ.U leans towards Industrials, Finance, and Non-Corporate. When evaluating costs, RTT features a management fee (MER) of 0.5%, compared to 0.45% for ZBBZ.U. Performance-wise, RTT has returned 13.63% year-to-date with +$0 M in net flows, whereas ZBBZ.U is at 3.66% with -$2 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
RTT
ZBBZ.U
| AuM | $4.05 M | $2.09 M |
| Management Fees | 0.50% | 0.45% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.04% | 0.45% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 19, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RTT | -5.44% | -1.27% | +13.63% | +7.01% | +48.46% |
ZBBZ.U | +0.16% | +1.33% | +3.66% | +4.62% | - | |
| Flows | RTT | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$2 M |
ZBBZ.U | -$2 M | -$2 M | -$2 M | +$0 M | +$0 M |
RTT vs ZBBZ.U exposure
Countries
RTT
Other
79.00%
Other
21.00%
ZBBZ.U
Other
90.62%
USA
8.90%
Sectors
RTT
Other
79.00%
Technology
17.71%
ZBBZ.U
Other
90.62%
Industrials
8.85%
As of October 19, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
RTT
US37954Y8710
20.44%
US37954Y6326
20.01%
US37954Y6730
19.19%
CA74642C3003
10.39%
CA74642X1069
8.13%
Nintendo Co., Ltd.
1.77%
NetEase, Inc.
1.58%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
1.55%
Unity Software, Inc.
1.48%
Bandai Namco Holdings, Inc.
1.40%
ZBBZ.U
US10548CAJ09
3.69%
US76857JAL61
3.37%
US74984FAG63
3.13%
US38181JAG40
3.09%
US67707ECA01
3.09%
US75884EAY86
2.40%
US25211AAU34
2.23%
US00037QAW96
2.23%
US64135PAQ19
1.99%
US817941AW76
1.96%
Diversification
RTT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 30 total
85.94%
ZBBZ.U
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 961 total
27.16%
Characteristics
Compare
RTT
ZBBZ.U
| Provider | Purpose Investments | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Fixed Income |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 5.96% | 6.56% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | October 19, 2023 | September 9, 2025 |
Frequently asked questions about RTT and ZBBZ.U
Which ETF has performed better year to date: RTT or ZBBZ.U?
As of October 19, 2026, RTT has returned 13.63% year to date, while ZBBZ.U has returned 3.66%. RTT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: RTT or ZBBZ.U?
As of October 19, 2026, RTT manages $4.05 M in assets, while ZBBZ.U manages $2.09 M. RTT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are RTT and ZBBZ.U managed?
RTT is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index. ZBBZ.U is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index.
What sectors do RTT and ZBBZ.U emphasize?
RTT is most exposed to Technology, Consumer Cyclicals, and Consumer Services. ZBBZ.U is most exposed to Industrials, Finance, and Non-Corporate.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: RTT or ZBBZ.U?
Year to date, RTT has seen +$0.00 M in net flows, compared with -$2.07 M for ZBBZ.U. RTT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of RTT and ZBBZ.U compare?
RTT has an expense ratio of 1.04%, while ZBBZ.U has an expense ratio of 0.45%.
What are the top holdings of RTT and ZBBZ.U?
RTT's largest holdings include Nintendo Co., Ltd. and NetEase, Inc.. ZBBZ.U's top holdings include RAD CLO 2024-24A, FRN 30jul2040, USD (21-12A, ABS, C2R) and CIFC Funding 2025-1A, FRN 15apr2038, USD (25-2A, ABS, D2).
Which ETF is more diversified: RTT or ZBBZ.U?
RTT holds 25 securities, while ZBBZ.U holds 72. On holdings count, ZBBZ.U is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about RTT and ZBBZ.U
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.