VS
Purpose Tactical Thematic Fund (RTT) and BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF (ZUT) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that RTT focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Industrials, and Finance, while ZUT leans towards Utilities, Energy, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, RTT features a management fee (MER) of 0.5%, compared to 0.55% for ZUT. Performance-wise, RTT has returned 15.84% year-to-date with +$0 M in net flows, whereas ZUT is at 22.38% with -$121 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
RTT
ZUT
| AuM | $4.13 M | $860.02 M |
| Management Fees | 0.50% | 0.55% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.04% | 0.61% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.85% |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 21, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RTT | -3.86% | +5.46% | +15.84% | +16.24% | - |
ZUT | +1.18% | +8.31% | +22.38% | +26.05% | +52.51% | |
| Flows | RTT | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | -$1 M | - |
ZUT | +$1 M | -$61 M | -$121 M | -$44 M | +$191 M |
RTT vs ZUT exposure
Countries
RTT
USA
48.51%
Other
28.08%
Other
23.41%
ZUT
Canada
84.68%
Bermuda
15.32%
Sectors
RTT
Other
28.08%
Technology
24.11%
Industrials
17.88%
Finance
8.27%
Non-Energy Materials
7.67%
Other
13.99%
ZUT
Utilities
85.04%
Energy
7.95%
Industrials
7.01%
As of July 21, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
RTT
CA74642X1069
27.27%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
3.22%
NVIDIA Corp.
2.24%
Apple, Inc.
1.96%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
1.74%
SK hynix, Inc.
1.63%
Microsoft Corp.
1.28%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.08%
Alphabet, Inc.
0.97%
Quanta Services, Inc.
0.89%
ZUT
Boralex, Inc.
9.46%
Capital Power Corp.
8.42%
Brookfield Renewable Partners LP
8.31%
AltaGas Ltd.
7.95%
ATCO Ltd.
7.77%
TransAlta Corp.
7.74%
Canadian Utilities Ltd.
7.65%
Emera, Inc.
7.38%
Fortis, Inc.
7.23%
Northland Power, Inc.
7.14%
Diversification
RTT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1,755 total
42.27%
ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 13 total
79.05%
Characteristics
Compare
RTT
ZUT
| Provider | Purpose Investments | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 5.85% | 2.71% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | October 19, 2023 | January 19, 2010 |
Frequently asked questions about RTT and ZUT
Which ETF has performed better year to date: RTT or ZUT?
As of July 21, 2026, RTT has returned 15.84% year to date, while ZUT has returned 22.38%. ZUT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: RTT or ZUT?
As of July 21, 2026, RTT manages $4.13 M in assets, while ZUT manages $860.02 M. ZUT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are RTT and ZUT managed?
RTT is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index. ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do RTT and ZUT emphasize?
RTT is most exposed to Technology, Industrials, and Finance. ZUT is most exposed to Utilities, Energy, and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: RTT or ZUT?
Year to date, RTT has seen +$0.00 M in net flows, compared with -$121.13 M for ZUT. RTT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of RTT and ZUT compare?
RTT has an expense ratio of 1.04%, while ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.
What are the top holdings of RTT and ZUT?
RTT's largest holdings include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. and NVIDIA Corp.. ZUT's top holdings include Boralex, Inc., Capital Power Corp., and Brookfield Renewable Partners LP.
Which ETF is more diversified: RTT or ZUT?
RTT holds 1689 securities, while ZUT holds 13. On holdings count, RTT is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about RTT and ZUT
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.