RTT
Purpose Tactical Thematic Fund

Full RTT fund page
VS
ZZZD
BMO Tactical Dividend ETF Fund

Full ZZZD fund page

Purpose Tactical Thematic Fund (RTT) and BMO Tactical Dividend ETF Fund (ZZZD) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that RTT focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Consumer Cyclicals, and Consumer Services, while ZZZD leans towards Finance, Technology, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, RTT features a management fee (MER) of 0.5%, compared to 0.7% for ZZZD. Performance-wise, RTT has returned 13.63% year-to-date with +$0 M in net flows, whereas ZZZD is at 11.81% with +$1 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-6.0-5.0-4.0-3.0-2.0-1.00.01.0%Sep 21Sep 28Oct 5Oct 12Oct 19

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of October 19, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
RTT
-5.44%-1.27%+13.63%+7.01%+48.46%
ZZZD
-0.34%+0.86%+11.81%+12.20%+31.36%
Flows
RTT
+$0 M+$0 M+$0 M+$0 M+$2 M
ZZZD
+$0 M+$0 M+$1 M+$1 M-$11 M

RTT vs ZZZD exposure

Countries

RTT
Other
79.00%
Other
21.00%
ZZZD
Other
82.89%
Other
17.11%

Sectors

RTT
Other
79.00%
Technology
17.71%
ZZZD
Other
82.87%
Other
17.13%
As of October 19, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

RTT
US37954Y8710
20.44%
US37954Y6326
20.01%
US37954Y6730
19.19%
CA74642C3003
10.39%
CA74642X1069
8.13%
Nintendo Co., Ltd.
1.77%
NetEase, Inc.
1.58%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
1.55%
Unity Software, Inc.
1.48%
Bandai Namco Holdings, Inc.
1.40%
ZZZD
CA05600A2092
24.47%
CA05580X1042
23.60%
CA05590N1042
13.22%
CA05591D1050
8.19%
CA05590J1030
7.60%
CA05592T1093
5.69%
MediaTek, Inc.
0.43%
China Construction Bank Corp.
0.33%
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
0.20%
United Microelectronics Corp.
0.17%

Diversification

RTT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 30 total
85.94%
ZZZD
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 2,453 total
83.91%

Characteristics

Compare
RTT
ZZZD
ProviderPurpose InvestmentsBMO
ManagementActively managedActively managed
Benchmark--
Replication Method--
Asset ClassEquityEquity, Fixed Income
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield5.96%3.75%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateOctober 19, 2023January 11, 2019

Frequently asked questions about RTT and ZZZD

Which ETF has performed better year to date: RTT or ZZZD?
As of October 19, 2026, RTT has returned 13.63% year to date, while ZZZD has returned 11.81%. RTT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: RTT or ZZZD?
As of October 19, 2026, RTT manages $4.05 M in assets, while ZZZD manages $25.42 M. ZZZD is the larger fund by AUM.
How are RTT and ZZZD managed?
RTT is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index. ZZZD is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index.
What sectors do RTT and ZZZD emphasize?
RTT is most exposed to Technology, Consumer Cyclicals, and Consumer Services. ZZZD is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: RTT or ZZZD?
Year to date, RTT has seen +$0.00 M in net flows, compared with +$1.48 M for ZZZD. ZZZD has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of RTT and ZZZD compare?
RTT has an expense ratio of 1.04%, while ZZZD has an expense ratio of 0.77%.
What are the top holdings of RTT and ZZZD?
RTT's largest holdings include Nintendo Co., Ltd. and NetEase, Inc.. ZZZD's top holdings include MediaTek, Inc. and China Construction Bank Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: RTT or ZZZD?
RTT holds 25 securities, while ZZZD holds 2439. On holdings count, ZZZD is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about RTT and ZZZD

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds