VS
RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (RUD) and CI U.S. 1000 Index ETF (CUSM.B) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that RUD focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Finance, and Industrials, while CUSM.B leans towards Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, RUD features a management fee (MER) of 0.39%, compared to 0.16% for CUSM.B. Performance-wise, RUD has returned 16.55% year-to-date with +$56 M in net flows, whereas CUSM.B is at 16.46% with +$28 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
RUD
CUSM.B
| AuM | $946.42 M | $226.66 M |
| Management Fees | 0.39% | 0.16% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.43% | 0.17% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of August 4, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RUD | +2.95% | +12.78% | +16.55% | +26.80% | +90.95% |
CUSM.B | +1.39% | +11.20% | +16.46% | +26.01% | +86.16% | |
| Flows | RUD | +$12 M | +$19 M | +$56 M | +$26 M | +$162 M |
CUSM.B | +$2 M | +$2 M | +$28 M | +$55 M | +$65 M |
RUD vs CUSM.B exposure
Countries
RUD
USA
99.29%
CUSM.B
USA
96.85%
Sectors
RUD
Technology
39.43%
Finance
12.27%
Industrials
9.05%
Consumer Cyclicals
7.45%
Other
31.79%
CUSM.B
Technology
42.92%
Finance
13.51%
Healthcare
9.13%
Industrials
8.74%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.60%
Other
17.10%
As of August 4, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
RUD
Apple, Inc.
8.91%
NVIDIA Corp.
8.56%
Alphabet, Inc.
5.55%
Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
3.17%
Colgate-Palmolive Co.
3.12%
Mastercard, Inc.
3.09%
Ameriprise Financial, Inc.
3.09%
Lam Research Corp.
2.53%
General Motors Co.
2.46%
GE Vernova, Inc.
2.42%
CUSM.B
NVIDIA Corp.
6.56%
Apple, Inc.
5.81%
Microsoft Corp.
3.89%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.32%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.97%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.56%
Broadcom Inc.
2.49%
Tesla, Inc.
1.98%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.86%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.77%
Diversification
RUD
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 100 total
42.89%
CUSM.B
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1,002 total
33.23%
Characteristics
Compare
RUD
CUSM.B
| Provider | RBC Global Asset Management | CI |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive GBS US 1000 Index TR - USD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.30% | 0.69% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | January 15, 2014 | August 17, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about RUD and CUSM.B
Which ETF has performed better year to date: RUD or CUSM.B?
As of August 4, 2026, RUD has returned 16.55% year to date, while CUSM.B has returned 16.46%. RUD is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: RUD or CUSM.B?
As of August 4, 2026, RUD manages $946.42 M in assets, while CUSM.B manages $226.66 M. RUD is the larger fund by AUM.
How are RUD and CUSM.B managed?
RUD is actively managed by RBC Global Asset Management. It does not track an index. CUSM.B is passively managed by CI. It tracks the Solactive GBS US 1000 Index TR - USD benchmark.
What sectors do RUD and CUSM.B emphasize?
RUD is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Industrials. CUSM.B is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: RUD or CUSM.B?
Year to date, RUD has seen +$55.71 M in net flows, compared with +$28.49 M for CUSM.B. RUD has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of RUD and CUSM.B compare?
RUD has an expense ratio of 0.43%, while CUSM.B has an expense ratio of 0.17%.
What are the top holdings of RUD and CUSM.B?
RUD's largest holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp., and Alphabet, Inc.. CUSM.B's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: RUD or CUSM.B?
RUD holds 100 securities, while CUSM.B holds 990. On holdings count, CUSM.B is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.