VS
Compare RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (RUD) vs RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (RUDH) to find the best fit for your portfolio. RUD and RUDH provide the same top sector exposures: Technology, Finance, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, RUD features a management fee (MER) of 0.39%, compared to 0.39% for RUDH. Performance-wise, RUD has returned 13.71% year-to-date with +$56 M in net flows, whereas RUDH is at 9.98% with +$68 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
RUD
RUDH
| AuM | $923.38 M | $250.81 M |
| Management Fees | 0.39% | 0.39% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.43% | 0.43% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 31, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RUD | +1.28% | +9.62% | +13.71% | +23.37% | +85.14% |
RUDH | +2.23% | +5.66% | +9.98% | +19.33% | +66.42% | |
| Flows | RUD | +$12 M | +$21 M | +$56 M | +$30 M | +$162 M |
RUDH | +$3 M | +$4 M | +$68 M | +$38 M | +$72 M |
RUD vs RUDH exposure
Countries
RUD
USA
99.29%
RUDH
USA
99.29%
Sectors
RUD
Technology
39.43%
Finance
12.27%
Industrials
9.05%
Consumer Cyclicals
7.45%
Other
31.79%
RUDH
Technology
39.43%
Finance
12.27%
Industrials
9.05%
Consumer Cyclicals
7.45%
Other
31.79%
As of July 31, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
RUD
Apple, Inc.
8.91%
NVIDIA Corp.
8.56%
Alphabet, Inc.
5.55%
Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
3.17%
Colgate-Palmolive Co.
3.12%
Mastercard, Inc.
3.09%
Ameriprise Financial, Inc.
3.09%
Lam Research Corp.
2.53%
General Motors Co.
2.46%
GE Vernova, Inc.
2.42%
RUDH
Apple, Inc.
8.91%
NVIDIA Corp.
8.56%
Alphabet, Inc.
5.55%
Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
3.17%
Colgate-Palmolive Co.
3.12%
Mastercard, Inc.
3.09%
Ameriprise Financial, Inc.
3.09%
Lam Research Corp.
2.53%
General Motors Co.
2.46%
GE Vernova, Inc.
2.42%
Diversification
RUD
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 100 total
42.89%
RUDH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 100 total
42.89%
Characteristics
Compare
RUD
RUDH
| Provider | RBC Global Asset Management | RBC Global Asset Management |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.33% | 1.56% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | January 15, 2014 | October 1, 2014 |
Frequently asked questions about RUD and RUDH
Which ETF has performed better year to date: RUD or RUDH?
As of July 31, 2026, RUD has returned 13.71% year to date, while RUDH has returned 9.98%. RUD is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: RUD or RUDH?
As of July 31, 2026, RUD manages $923.38 M in assets, while RUDH manages $250.81 M. RUD is the larger fund by AUM.
How are RUD and RUDH managed?
RUD is actively managed by RBC Global Asset Management. It does not track an index. RUDH is actively managed by RBC Global Asset Management. It does not track an index.
What sectors do RUD and RUDH emphasize?
RUD is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Industrials. RUDH is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: RUD or RUDH?
Year to date, RUD has seen +$55.71 M in net flows, compared with +$68.23 M for RUDH. RUDH has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of RUD and RUDH compare?
RUD has an expense ratio of 0.43%, while RUDH has an expense ratio of 0.43%.
What are the top holdings of RUD and RUDH?
RUD's largest holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp., and Alphabet, Inc.. RUDH's top holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: RUD or RUDH?
RUD holds 100 securities, while RUDH holds 100. On holdings count, RUD is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.