VS
RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (RUD) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (XUU) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that RUD focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Finance, and Industrials, while XUU leans towards Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, RUD features a management fee (MER) of 0.39%, compared to 0.07% for XUU. Performance-wise, RUD has returned 13.71% year-to-date with +$56 M in net flows, whereas XUU is at 12.97% with +$82 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
RUD
XUU
| AuM | $923.38 M | $4,560.98 M |
| Management Fees | 0.39% | 0.07% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.43% | 0.07% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.07% |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 31, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RUD | +1.28% | +9.62% | +13.71% | +23.37% | +85.14% |
XUU | -1.10% | +7.51% | +12.97% | +20.92% | +77.13% | |
| Flows | RUD | +$12 M | +$21 M | +$56 M | +$30 M | +$162 M |
XUU | -$49 M | -$15 M | +$82 M | +$66 M | +$436 M |
RUD vs XUU exposure
Countries
RUD
USA
99.29%
XUU
USA
97.23%
Sectors
RUD
Technology
39.43%
Finance
12.27%
Industrials
9.05%
Consumer Cyclicals
7.45%
Other
31.79%
XUU
Technology
42.88%
Finance
14.12%
Healthcare
8.90%
Industrials
8.80%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.23%
Other
17.07%
As of July 31, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
RUD
Apple, Inc.
8.91%
NVIDIA Corp.
8.56%
Alphabet, Inc.
5.55%
Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
3.17%
Colgate-Palmolive Co.
3.12%
Mastercard, Inc.
3.09%
Ameriprise Financial, Inc.
3.09%
Lam Research Corp.
2.53%
General Motors Co.
2.46%
GE Vernova, Inc.
2.42%
XUU
NVIDIA Corp.
6.65%
Apple, Inc.
5.83%
Microsoft Corp.
3.80%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.20%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.87%
Broadcom Inc.
2.52%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.29%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.79%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.70%
Tesla, Inc.
1.62%
Diversification
RUD
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 100 total
42.89%
XUU
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 2,464 total
32.28%
Characteristics
Compare
RUD
XUU
| Provider | RBC Global Asset Management | iShares |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | S&P Total Market Net Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.33% | 1.03% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | January 15, 2014 | February 10, 2015 |
Frequently asked questions about RUD and XUU
Which ETF has performed better year to date: RUD or XUU?
As of July 31, 2026, RUD has returned 13.71% year to date, while XUU has returned 12.97%. RUD is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: RUD or XUU?
As of July 31, 2026, RUD manages $923.38 M in assets, while XUU manages $4.56 B. XUU is the larger fund by AUM.
How are RUD and XUU managed?
RUD is actively managed by RBC Global Asset Management. It does not track an index. XUU is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P Total Market Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do RUD and XUU emphasize?
RUD is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Industrials. XUU is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: RUD or XUU?
Year to date, RUD has seen +$55.71 M in net flows, compared with +$82.47 M for XUU. XUU has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of RUD and XUU compare?
RUD has an expense ratio of 0.43%, while XUU has an expense ratio of 0.07%.
What are the top holdings of RUD and XUU?
RUD's largest holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp., and Alphabet, Inc.. XUU's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: RUD or XUU?
RUD holds 100 securities, while XUU holds 2427. On holdings count, XUU is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.