VS
RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (RUDH) and CI U.S. 1000 Index ETF (CUSM.B) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that RUDH focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Finance, and Industrials, while CUSM.B leans towards Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, RUDH features a management fee (MER) of 0.39%, compared to 0.16% for CUSM.B. Performance-wise, RUDH has returned 11.06% year-to-date with +$68 M in net flows, whereas CUSM.B is at 15.82% with +$30 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
RUDH
CUSM.B
| AuM | $252.65 M | $227.04 M |
| Management Fees | 0.39% | 0.16% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.43% | 0.17% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 19, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RUDH | -0.44% | +2.53% | +11.06% | +14.54% | +76.91% |
CUSM.B | -0.52% | +3.45% | +15.82% | +14.98% | +89.09% | |
| Flows | RUDH | -$0 M | +$1 M | +$68 M | +$38 M | +$72 M |
CUSM.B | -$2 M | +$4 M | +$30 M | +$49 M | +$60 M |
RUDH vs CUSM.B exposure
Countries
RUDH
USA
99.27%
CUSM.B
USA
97.07%
Sectors
RUDH
Technology
40.41%
Finance
11.58%
Industrials
9.36%
Healthcare
8.45%
Other
30.19%
CUSM.B
Technology
43.09%
Finance
13.89%
Healthcare
9.50%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.59%
Industrials
8.03%
Other
16.89%
As of October 19, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
RUDH
NVIDIA Corp.
9.10%
Apple, Inc.
7.83%
Alphabet, Inc.
5.32%
Microsoft Corp.
4.45%
Colgate-Palmolive Co.
3.03%
Ameriprise Financial, Inc.
3.01%
Eli Lilly & Co.
2.95%
Bristol Myers Squibb Co.
2.50%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.45%
Mastercard, Inc.
2.38%
CUSM.B
NVIDIA Corp.
7.21%
Apple, Inc.
6.35%
Microsoft Corp.
5.22%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.50%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.78%
Broadcom Inc.
2.42%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.39%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.76%
Tesla, Inc.
1.58%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.52%
Diversification
RUDH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 111 total
43.01%
CUSM.B
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1,006 total
34.74%
Characteristics
Compare
RUDH
CUSM.B
| Provider | RBC Global Asset Management | CI |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive GBS US 1000 Index TR - USD |
| Replication Method | - | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.57% | 0.64% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | October 1, 2014 | August 17, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about RUDH and CUSM.B
Which ETF has performed better year to date: RUDH or CUSM.B?
As of October 19, 2026, RUDH has returned 11.06% year to date, while CUSM.B has returned 15.82%. CUSM.B is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: RUDH or CUSM.B?
As of October 19, 2026, RUDH manages $252.65 M in assets, while CUSM.B manages $227.04 M. RUDH is the larger fund by AUM.
How are RUDH and CUSM.B managed?
RUDH is actively managed by RBC Global Asset Management. It does not track an index. CUSM.B is passively managed by CI. It tracks the Solactive GBS US 1000 Index TR - USD benchmark.
What sectors do RUDH and CUSM.B emphasize?
RUDH is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Industrials. CUSM.B is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: RUDH or CUSM.B?
Year to date, RUDH has seen +$68.22 M in net flows, compared with +$30.35 M for CUSM.B. RUDH has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of RUDH and CUSM.B compare?
RUDH has an expense ratio of 0.43%, while CUSM.B has an expense ratio of 0.17%.
What are the top holdings of RUDH and CUSM.B?
RUDH's largest holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc.. CUSM.B's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: RUDH or CUSM.B?
RUDH holds 111 securities, while CUSM.B holds 996. On holdings count, CUSM.B is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.