RUQQ.U
RBC Target 2028 U.S. Corporate Bond ETF

Full RUQQ.U fund page
VS
HBNK
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index ETF

Full HBNK fund page

When evaluating costs, RUQQ.U features a management fee (MER) of 0.2%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Performance-wise, RUQQ.U has returned 0.48% year-to-date with +$1 M in net flows, whereas HBNK is at 13.38% with -$445 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0246810%Apr 6Apr 13Apr 20Apr 27May 4

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of May 5, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
RUQQ.U
+0.19%-0.03%+0.48%+4.38%-
HBNK
+8.75%+10.98%+13.38%+63.47%-
Flows
RUQQ.U
+$0 M+$1 M+$1 M+$6 M-
HBNK
-$203 M-$380 M-$445 M-$701 M-

RUQQ.U vs HBNK exposure

Countries

RUQQ.U
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Canada
99.99%

Sectors

RUQQ.U
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Financials
99.99%
As of May 5, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

RUQQ.U
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
ROYAL BK CANADA
17.11%
TORONTO DOMINION
16.89%
BNS
16.66%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.52%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
16.47%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.34%

Diversification

RUQQ.U
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.99%

Characteristics

Compare
RUQQ.U
HBNK
ProviderRBC Global Asset ManagementGlobal X
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassFixed IncomeEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield3.25%2.93%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateApril 24, 2024July 5, 2023

Frequently asked questions about RUQQ.U and HBNK

Which ETF has performed better year to date: RUQQ.U or HBNK?
As of May 5, 2026, RUQQ.U has returned 0.48% year to date, while HBNK has returned 13.38%. HBNK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: RUQQ.U or HBNK?
As of May 5, 2026, RUQQ.U manages $14.25 M in assets, while HBNK manages $688.12 M. HBNK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are RUQQ.U and HBNK managed?
RUQQ.U is actively managed by RBC Global Asset Management. It does not track an index. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: RUQQ.U or HBNK?
Year to date, RUQQ.U has seen +$0.77 M in net flows, compared with -$445.21 M for HBNK. RUQQ.U has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of RUQQ.U and HBNK compare?
RUQQ.U has an expense ratio of 0.23%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.

Recent articles about RUQQ.U and HBNK

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds