VS
When evaluating costs, RUQU.U features a management fee (MER) of 0.2%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
RUQU.U
HBNK
| AuM | $0.72 M | $861.05 M |
| Management Fees | 0.20% | 0.09% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.20% | 0.10% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.37% |
Historical performance and flows
As of April 9, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RUQU.U | - | - | - | - | - |
HBNK | +5.81% | +7.61% | +9.18% | +73.73% | - | |
| Flows | RUQU.U | - | - | - | - | - |
HBNK | -$29 M | -$206 M | -$246 M | -$505 M | - |
RUQU.U vs HBNK exposure
Countries
RUQU.U
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Canada
99.69%
Sectors
RUQU.U
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Financials
99.69%
As of April 9, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
RUQU.U
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
17.58%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
17.35%
TORONTO DOMINION
17.25%
BNS
16.27%
ROYAL BK CANADA
15.76%
BANK OF MONTREAL
15.48%
Diversification
RUQU.U
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.69%
Characteristics
Compare
RUQU.U
HBNK
| Provider | RBC Global Asset Management | Global X |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | - | 3.01% |
| Meets ESG criteria | - | No |
| Inception Date | March 25, 2026 | July 5, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about RUQU.U and HBNK
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: RUQU.U or HBNK?
As of April 9, 2026, RUQU.U manages $0.72 M in assets, while HBNK manages $861.05 M. HBNK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are RUQU.U and HBNK managed?
RUQU.U is actively managed by RBC Global Asset Management. It does not track an index. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
How do the fees of RUQU.U and HBNK compare?
RUQU.U has an expense ratio of 0.20%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.
Recent articles about RUQU.U and HBNK
Bank Stocks: An Undervalued Gem?
Bank stocks are poised for growth amid declining inflation and rate cuts.
Posted on 7/29/2024 by ETF Market Canada inBanks
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.