VS
When evaluating costs, RUQU.U features a management fee (MER) of 0.2%, compared to 0.08% for ZSP. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
RUQU.U
ZSP
| AuM | $0.72 M | $21,392.18 M |
| Management Fees | 0.20% | 0.08% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.20% | 0.09% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.65% |
Historical performance and flows
As of April 9, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RUQU.U | - | - | - | - | - |
ZSP | +2.50% | -2.39% | +0.62% | +29.37% | +75.53% | |
| Flows | RUQU.U | - | - | - | - | - |
ZSP | -$152 M | -$179 M | +$241 M | +$1,408 M | +$4,382 M |
RUQU.U vs ZSP exposure
Countries
RUQU.U
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
USA
96.94%
Sectors
RUQU.U
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Information Technology
34.08%
Financials
10.54%
Communication Services
10.30%
Consumer Discretionary
9.98%
Health Care
9.46%
Industrials
8.53%
Other
17.11%
As of April 9, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
RUQU.U
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
NVIDIA
7.62%
APPLE
6.84%
MICROSOFT-T
5.07%
AMAZON.COM INC
3.44%
ALPHABET INC-CL
3.04%
BROADCOM LIMITED
2.58%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.42%
META PLATFORMS
2.42%
TESLA
1.94%
BERKSHIRE HATHWAY
1.57%
Diversification
RUQU.U
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 502 total
36.93%
Characteristics
Compare
RUQU.U
ZSP
| Provider | RBC Global Asset Management | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | - | 0.83% |
| Meets ESG criteria | - | No |
| Inception Date | March 25, 2026 | November 14, 2012 |
Frequently asked questions about RUQU.U and ZSP
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: RUQU.U or ZSP?
As of April 9, 2026, RUQU.U manages $0.72 M in assets, while ZSP manages $21.39 B. ZSP is the larger fund by AUM.
How are RUQU.U and ZSP managed?
RUQU.U is actively managed by RBC Global Asset Management. It does not track an index. ZSP is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
How do the fees of RUQU.U and ZSP compare?
RUQU.U has an expense ratio of 0.20%, while ZSP has an expense ratio of 0.09%.
Recent articles about RUQU.U and ZSP
A Guide to Active vs Passive ETFs for Canadian Investors
Discover the difference between active and passive ETFs in this comprehensive guide. Learn about their strategies, advantages, drawbacks, and how to combine both for a balanced investment approach.
Posted on 7/19/2023 by Tony Dong inETF Ecosystem
BMO ETF Spotlight - More than Just a Bank
BMO is more than just a bank, learn more about BMO’s extensive ETF offerings.
Posted on 3/22/2023 by ETF Market Canada inBanks
The Top Canadian ETFs by AUM in 2023
These ETFs rank among the largest in the Canadian industry.
Posted on 1/11/2023 by Tony Dong inETFs
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.