VS
When evaluating costs, RUQU.U features a management fee (MER) of 0.2%, compared to 0.55% for ZUT. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
RUQU.U
ZUT
| AuM | $0.72 M | $902.26 M |
| Management Fees | 0.20% | 0.55% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.20% | 0.61% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.74% |
Historical performance and flows
As of April 9, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RUQU.U | - | - | - | - | - |
ZUT | +8.71% | +18.24% | +19.10% | +42.90% | +43.12% | |
| Flows | RUQU.U | - | - | - | - | - |
ZUT | +$20 M | -$48 M | -$62 M | +$103 M | +$251 M |
RUQU.U vs ZUT exposure
Countries
RUQU.U
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Canada
82.74%
Bermuda
17.26%
Sectors
RUQU.U
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Utilities
100.00%
As of April 9, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
RUQU.U
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
BROOKFIELD INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS LP UNIT
8.73%
ATCO
8.70%
BROOKFIELD RENEWABLE PARTNERS
8.53%
CANADIAN UTILITIES
8.28%
ALGONQUIN POWER
8.23%
HYDRO ONE
7.94%
FORTIS
7.66%
ALTAGAS
7.40%
EMERA
7.26%
CAPITAL POWER
7.12%
Diversification
RUQU.U
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 13 total
79.85%
Characteristics
Compare
RUQU.U
ZUT
| Provider | RBC Global Asset Management | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | - | 2.84% |
| Meets ESG criteria | - | No |
| Inception Date | March 25, 2026 | January 19, 2010 |
Frequently asked questions about RUQU.U and ZUT
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: RUQU.U or ZUT?
As of April 9, 2026, RUQU.U manages $0.72 M in assets, while ZUT manages $902.26 M. ZUT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are RUQU.U and ZUT managed?
RUQU.U is actively managed by RBC Global Asset Management. It does not track an index. ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
How do the fees of RUQU.U and ZUT compare?
RUQU.U has an expense ratio of 0.20%, while ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.
Recent articles about RUQU.U and ZUT
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.