VS
Compare RBC U.S. Large-Cap Equity ETF (RUSA) vs CI S&P 500 ESG Index ETF (ESG.F) to find the best fit for your portfolio. RUSA provides Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals exposures, while ESG.F is primarily weighted in Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, RUSA features a management fee (MER) of 0.39%, compared to 0.15% for ESG.F. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
RUSA
ESG.F
| AuM | $1.72 M | $101.76 M |
| Management Fees | 0.39% | 0.15% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.39% | 0.17% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.05% |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 2, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RUSA | -3.33% | -3.03% | - | - | - |
ESG.F | -3.17% | -3.74% | +8.20% | +9.29% | +69.02% | |
| Flows | RUSA | +$0 M | +$1 M | - | - | - |
ESG.F | +$0 M | +$0 M | -$16 M | -$9 M | +$26 M |
RUSA vs ESG.F exposure
Countries
RUSA
USA
95.30%
ESG.F
USA
96.60%
Sectors
RUSA
Technology
45.77%
Finance
14.22%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
10.46%
Industrials
10.11%
Healthcare
8.92%
Other
10.53%
ESG.F
Technology
49.22%
Finance
13.83%
Healthcare
11.47%
Industrials
7.83%
Other
17.65%
As of November 2, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
RUSA
NVIDIA Corp.
8.94%
Apple, Inc.
7.65%
Microsoft Corp.
6.60%
Alphabet, Inc.
6.41%
Amazon.com, Inc.
4.31%
Broadcom Inc.
3.69%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
3.17%
Micron Technology, Inc.
3.10%
Eli Lilly & Co.
2.36%
Visa, Inc.
2.36%
ESG.F
NVIDIA Corp.
13.73%
Microsoft Corp.
9.46%
Alphabet, Inc.
5.01%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.02%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.99%
Eli Lilly & Co.
2.30%
Visa, Inc.
1.52%
Intel Corp.
1.48%
Walmart, Inc.
1.15%
AbbVie, Inc.
1.15%
Diversification
RUSA
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 51 total
48.60%
ESG.F
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 325 total
42.81%
Characteristics
Compare
RUSA
ESG.F
| Provider | RBC Global Asset Management | CI |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | S&P 500 Scored & Screened CAD Hedged NTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | - | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | - | 0.83% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | Yes |
| Inception Date | March 25, 2026 | February 14, 2020 |
Frequently asked questions about RUSA and ESG.F
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: RUSA or ESG.F?
As of November 2, 2026, RUSA manages $1.72 M in assets, while ESG.F manages $101.76 M. ESG.F is the larger fund by AUM.
How are RUSA and ESG.F managed?
RUSA is actively managed by RBC Global Asset Management. It does not track an index. ESG.F is passively managed by CI. It tracks the S&P 500 Scored & Screened CAD Hedged NTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do RUSA and ESG.F emphasize?
RUSA is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. ESG.F is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
How do the fees of RUSA and ESG.F compare?
RUSA has an expense ratio of 0.39%, while ESG.F has an expense ratio of 0.17%.
What are the top holdings of RUSA and ESG.F?
RUSA's largest holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Microsoft Corp.. ESG.F's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Microsoft Corp., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: RUSA or ESG.F?
RUSA holds 51 securities, while ESG.F holds 322. On holdings count, ESG.F is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.