VS
Compare RBC Short Term U.S. Corporate Bond ETF (RUSB) vs RBC Short Term U.S. Corporate Bond ETF (RUSB.U) to find the best fit for your portfolio. RUSB and RUSB.U provide the same top sector exposures: Finance, Utilities, and Technology. When evaluating costs, RUSB features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.35% for RUSB.U. Performance-wise, RUSB has returned 2.93% year-to-date with +$1 M in net flows, whereas RUSB.U is at 0.14% with +$58 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
RUSB
RUSB.U
| AuM | $5.90 M | $370.69 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.35% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.40% | 0.40% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 19, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RUSB | +0.49% | -0.34% | +2.93% | +1.09% | +19.83% |
RUSB.U | -0.05% | -0.58% | +0.14% | +0.68% | +16.79% | |
| Flows | RUSB | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$1 M | +$1 M | +$4 M |
RUSB.U | +$9 M | +$19 M | +$58 M | +$59 M | +$130 M |
RUSB vs RUSB.U exposure
Countries
RUSB
USA
80.32%
Other
19.68%
RUSB.U
USA
80.32%
Other
19.68%
Sectors
RUSB
Finance
48.48%
Utilities
7.11%
Other
44.41%
RUSB.U
Finance
48.48%
Utilities
7.11%
Other
44.41%
As of October 19, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
RUSB
USA, Notes 4.125% 31oct2029, USD (AF-2029)
2.22%
USA, Notes 3.875% 30apr2030, USD (Y-2030)
2.05%
USA, Notes 4.875% 31oct2030, USD (R-2030)
1.72%
Morgan Stanley, 4.21% 20apr2028, USD (I)
1.15%
Bank of America Corporation, 4.376% 27apr2028, USD (N)
1.11%
Goldman Sachs, 6.484% 24oct2029, USD
1.11%
US48128BAV36
1.03%
US00287YEN58
1.01%
Lincoln Financial Global Funding, 4.95% 21may2031, USD (2026-2)
1.01%
Morgan Stanley, 5.164% 20apr2029, USD (I)
0.96%
RUSB.U
USA, Notes 4.125% 31oct2029, USD (AF-2029)
2.22%
USA, Notes 3.875% 30apr2030, USD (Y-2030)
2.05%
USA, Notes 4.875% 31oct2030, USD (R-2030)
1.72%
Morgan Stanley, 4.21% 20apr2028, USD (I)
1.15%
Bank of America Corporation, 4.376% 27apr2028, USD (N)
1.11%
Goldman Sachs, 6.484% 24oct2029, USD
1.11%
US48128BAV36
1.03%
US00287YEN58
1.01%
Lincoln Financial Global Funding, 4.95% 21may2031, USD (2026-2)
1.01%
Morgan Stanley, 5.164% 20apr2029, USD (I)
0.96%
Diversification
RUSB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 173 total
13.36%
RUSB.U
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 173 total
13.36%
Characteristics
Compare
RUSB
RUSB.U
| Provider | RBC Global Asset Management | RBC Global Asset Management |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 4.33% | 4.39% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | October 19, 2017 | October 19, 2017 |
Frequently asked questions about RUSB and RUSB.U
Which ETF has performed better year to date: RUSB or RUSB.U?
As of October 19, 2026, RUSB has returned 2.93% year to date, while RUSB.U has returned 0.14%. RUSB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: RUSB or RUSB.U?
As of October 19, 2026, RUSB manages $5.90 M in assets, while RUSB.U manages $370.69 M. RUSB.U is the larger fund by AUM.
How are RUSB and RUSB.U managed?
RUSB is actively managed by RBC Global Asset Management. It does not track an index. RUSB.U is actively managed by RBC Global Asset Management. It does not track an index.
What sectors do RUSB and RUSB.U emphasize?
RUSB is most exposed to Finance, Utilities, and Technology. RUSB.U is most exposed to Finance, Utilities, and Technology.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: RUSB or RUSB.U?
Year to date, RUSB has seen +$1.08 M in net flows, compared with +$57.90 M for RUSB.U. RUSB.U has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of RUSB and RUSB.U compare?
RUSB has an expense ratio of 0.40%, while RUSB.U has an expense ratio of 0.40%.
What are the top holdings of RUSB and RUSB.U?
RUSB's largest holdings include USA, Notes 4.125% 31oct2029, USD (AF-2029) and USA, Notes 3.875% 30apr2030, USD (Y-2030). RUSB.U's top holdings include USA, Notes 4.125% 31oct2029, USD (AF-2029) and USA, Notes 3.875% 30apr2030, USD (Y-2030).
Which ETF is more diversified: RUSB or RUSB.U?
RUSB holds 169 securities, while RUSB.U holds 169. On holdings count, RUSB is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about RUSB and RUSB.U
Benefiting from active management in Fixed Income
Passive index investment strategies are designed to mirror the composition and performance of a benchmark index. In contrast, active strategies can differ from the index in the pursuit of better returns.
Posted on 4/25/2024 by Kyle Anthony inFixed Income
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.