RBC Short Term U.S. Corporate Bond ETF (RUSB) and BMO Mid-Term US IG Corporate Bond Index ETF (ZIC.U) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that RUSB focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Finance, Utilities, and Technology, while ZIC.U leans towards Finance, Technology, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, RUSB features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.25% for ZIC.U. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
| AuM | $5.90 M | $0.00 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.25% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.40% | 0.28% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RUSB | +0.49% | -0.34% | +2.93% | +1.09% | +19.83% |
ZIC.U | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Flows | RUSB | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$1 M | +$1 M | +$4 M |
ZIC.U | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M |
RUSB vs ZIC.U exposure
Countries
Sectors
Top 10 Holdings
Diversification
Characteristics
| Provider | RBC Global Asset Management | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Bloomberg U.S. Investment Grade 5-10 Year Corporate Bond Capped Total Return Index - USD |
| Replication Method | - | Other |
| Asset Class | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 4.33% | - |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | October 19, 2017 | March 19, 2013 |
Frequently asked questions about RUSB and ZIC.U
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: RUSB or ZIC.U?
How do the fees of RUSB and ZIC.U compare?
What are the top holdings of RUSB and ZIC.U?
Which ETF is more diversified: RUSB or ZIC.U?
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: RUSB or ZIC.U?
How are RUSB and ZIC.U managed?
What sectors do RUSB and ZIC.U emphasize?
Recent articles about RUSB and ZIC.U

Benefiting from active management in Fixed Income
Passive index investment strategies are designed to mirror the composition and performance of a benchmark index. In contrast, active strategies can differ from the index in the pursuit of better returns.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.


