VS
When evaluating costs, SCGI features a management fee (MER) of 0.9%, compared to 0.7% for CINF. Performance-wise, SCGI has returned 23.96% year-to-date with +$0 M in net flows, whereas CINF is at 17.31% with +$21 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
SCGI
CINF
| AuM | $5.01 M | $470.12 M |
| Management Fees | 0.90% | 0.70% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.25% | 0.90% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SCGI | +1.45% | +3.11% | +23.96% | +20.11% | +72.82% |
CINF | +2.66% | +2.33% | +17.31% | +13.89% | +62.32% | |
| Flows | SCGI | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | -$7 M |
CINF | -$13 M | +$10 M | +$21 M | +$24 M | +$44 M |
SCGI vs CINF exposure
Countries
SCGI
Exposure data will be available soon
CINF
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
SCGI
Exposure data will be available soon
CINF
Exposure data will be available soon
As of November 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
SCGI
Exposure data will be available soon
CINF
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
SCGI
Exposure data will be available soon
CINF
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
SCGI
CINF
| Provider | Starlight Capital | CI |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 4.15% | 2.44% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | October 2, 2018 | May 12, 2020 |
Frequently asked questions about SCGI and CINF
Which ETF has performed better year to date: SCGI or CINF?
As of November 11, 2026, SCGI has returned 23.96% year to date, while CINF has returned 17.31%. SCGI is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: SCGI or CINF?
As of November 11, 2026, SCGI manages $5.01 M in assets, while CINF manages $470.12 M. CINF is the larger fund by AUM.
How are SCGI and CINF managed?
SCGI is actively managed by Starlight Capital. It does not track an index. CINF is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: SCGI or CINF?
Year to date, SCGI has seen +$0.00 M in net flows, compared with +$21.40 M for CINF. CINF has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of SCGI and CINF compare?
SCGI has an expense ratio of 1.25%, while CINF has an expense ratio of 0.90%.
Recent articles about SCGI and CINF
SCGI ETF: A Defensive, High-Income Play on the $15T Infrastructure Gap
This fund offers a diversified, income-focused solution for investors to capitalize on the growing multi-trillion dollar global infrastructure gap, with a timely emphasis on energy and utilities.
Posted on 9/9/2025 by Kyle Anthony inInfrastructure
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.