VS
When evaluating costs, SHLD features a management fee (MER) of 0.49%, compared to 0.2% for CIAI. Performance-wise, SHLD has returned 0.16% year-to-date with +$83 M in net flows, whereas CIAI is at 21.44% with -$144 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
SHLD
CIAI
| AuM | $216.24 M | $1,069.47 M |
| Management Fees | 0.49% | 0.20% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.49% | 0.64% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.82% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 27, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SHLD | +3.05% | -1.48% | +0.16% | -6.66% | - |
CIAI | -7.16% | +3.16% | +21.44% | +12.60% | - | |
| Flows | SHLD | -$5 M | -$8 M | +$83 M | +$97 M | - |
CIAI | -$80 M | -$59 M | -$144 M | -$89 M | - |
SHLD vs CIAI exposure
Countries
SHLD
Exposure data will be available soon
CIAI
USA
79.07%
Other
20.93%
Sectors
SHLD
Exposure data will be available soon
CIAI
Technology
78.75%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.04%
Other
14.21%
As of October 27, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
SHLD
Exposure data will be available soon
CIAI
NVIDIA Corp.
11.95%
Broadcom Inc.
7.21%
Amazon.com, Inc.
7.04%
Microsoft Corp.
6.04%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
5.76%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
4.53%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.39%
ASML Holding NV
4.14%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
4.00%
Palantir Technologies, Inc.
3.44%
Diversification
SHLD
Exposure data will be available soon
CIAI
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 43 total
58.50%
Characteristics
Compare
SHLD
CIAI
| Provider | Global X | CI |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | Global X Defense Tech Index - CAD | - |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.18% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | April 30, 2025 | May 2, 2024 |
Frequently asked questions about SHLD and CIAI
Which ETF has performed better year to date: SHLD or CIAI?
As of October 27, 2026, SHLD has returned 0.16% year to date, while CIAI has returned 21.44%. CIAI is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: SHLD or CIAI?
As of October 27, 2026, SHLD manages $216.24 M in assets, while CIAI manages $1.07 B. CIAI is the larger fund by AUM.
How are SHLD and CIAI managed?
SHLD is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Global X Defense Tech Index - CAD benchmark. CIAI is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: SHLD or CIAI?
Year to date, SHLD has seen +$82.99 M in net flows, compared with -$143.65 M for CIAI. SHLD has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of SHLD and CIAI compare?
SHLD has an expense ratio of 0.49%, while CIAI has an expense ratio of 0.64%.
Recent articles about SHLD and CIAI

Chip Stocks Enter a Bear Market: What It Means for Canadian AI ETFs
Canadian-listed semiconductor and AI ETFs fell as much as 11% this week as chip stocks entered a global bear market, even as investors kept adding money into the weakness.
Posted on 7/20/2026 by Edouard Caillieux inArtificial Intelligence
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.




