VS
When evaluating costs, SITB features a management fee (MER) of 0.05%, compared to 0.25% for ZEB. Performance-wise, SITB has returned 0.71% year-to-date with +$258 M in net flows, whereas ZEB is at 33.39% with +$258 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
SITB
ZEB
| AuM | $2,726.27 M | $7,339.29 M |
| Management Fees | 0.05% | 0.25% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.09% | 0.28% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.02% | -0.62% |
Historical performance and flows
As of August 7, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SITB | -0.78% | +0.17% | +0.71% | +2.25% | +13.35% |
ZEB | +0.10% | +15.96% | +33.39% | +68.10% | +154.65% | |
| Flows | SITB | +$33 M | +$247 M | +$258 M | +$1,540 M | +$2,511 M |
ZEB | +$438 M | +$1,372 M | +$258 M | +$251 M | -$751 M |
SITB vs ZEB exposure
Countries
SITB
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Canada
100.00%
Sectors
SITB
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Finance
100.00%
As of August 7, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
SITB
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.42%
Royal Bank of Canada
17.32%
Bank of Montreal
17.15%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.61%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
15.79%
National Bank of Canada
15.70%
Diversification
SITB
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
Characteristics
Compare
SITB
ZEB
| Provider | Scotia Bank | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Solactive Broad Canadian Bond Universe Liquid ex MPL Total Return Index - CAD | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 3.20% | 2.28% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | March 11, 2020 | October 20, 2009 |
Frequently asked questions about SITB and ZEB
Which ETF has performed better year to date: SITB or ZEB?
As of August 7, 2026, SITB has returned 0.71% year to date, while ZEB has returned 33.39%. ZEB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: SITB or ZEB?
As of August 7, 2026, SITB manages $2.73 B in assets, while ZEB manages $7.34 B. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are SITB and ZEB managed?
SITB is passively managed by Scotia Bank. It tracks the Solactive Broad Canadian Bond Universe Liquid ex MPL Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: SITB or ZEB?
Year to date, SITB has seen +$257.63 M in net flows, compared with +$257.86 M for ZEB. ZEB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of SITB and ZEB compare?
SITB has an expense ratio of 0.09%, while ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
Recent articles about SITB and ZEB
Bank Stocks: An Undervalued Gem?
Bank stocks are poised for growth amid declining inflation and rate cuts.
Posted on 7/29/2024 by ETF Market Canada inBanks
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.