VS
When evaluating costs, SITB features a management fee (MER) of 0.05%, compared to 0.55% for ZUT. Performance-wise, SITB has returned 0.87% year-to-date with +$258 M in net flows, whereas ZUT is at 18.32% with -$108 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
SITB
ZUT
| AuM | $2,730.53 M | $842.91 M |
| Management Fees | 0.05% | 0.55% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.09% | 0.61% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.02% | -0.82% |
Historical performance and flows
As of August 6, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SITB | -1.12% | +0.17% | +0.87% | +2.44% | +13.53% |
ZUT | -1.45% | +1.92% | +18.32% | +22.98% | +55.21% | |
| Flows | SITB | +$33 M | +$247 M | +$258 M | +$1,540 M | +$2,511 M |
ZUT | +$20 M | -$47 M | -$108 M | -$32 M | +$209 M |
SITB vs ZUT exposure
Countries
SITB
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Canada
84.68%
Bermuda
15.32%
Sectors
SITB
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Utilities
85.04%
Energy
7.95%
Industrials
7.01%
As of August 6, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
SITB
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Boralex, Inc.
9.46%
Capital Power Corp.
8.42%
Brookfield Renewable Partners LP
8.31%
AltaGas Ltd.
7.95%
ATCO Ltd.
7.77%
TransAlta Corp.
7.74%
Canadian Utilities Ltd.
7.65%
Emera, Inc.
7.38%
Fortis, Inc.
7.23%
Northland Power, Inc.
7.14%
Diversification
SITB
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 13 total
79.05%
Characteristics
Compare
SITB
ZUT
| Provider | Scotia Bank | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Solactive Broad Canadian Bond Universe Liquid ex MPL Total Return Index - CAD | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 3.19% | 2.80% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | March 11, 2020 | January 19, 2010 |
Frequently asked questions about SITB and ZUT
Which ETF has performed better year to date: SITB or ZUT?
As of August 6, 2026, SITB has returned 0.87% year to date, while ZUT has returned 18.32%. ZUT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: SITB or ZUT?
As of August 6, 2026, SITB manages $2.73 B in assets, while ZUT manages $842.91 M. SITB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are SITB and ZUT managed?
SITB is passively managed by Scotia Bank. It tracks the Solactive Broad Canadian Bond Universe Liquid ex MPL Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: SITB or ZUT?
Year to date, SITB has seen +$257.63 M in net flows, compared with -$107.60 M for ZUT. SITB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of SITB and ZUT compare?
SITB has an expense ratio of 0.09%, while ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.
Recent articles about SITB and ZUT
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.