VS
Compare Scotia Emerging Markets Equity Index Tracker ETF (SITE) vs BMO MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETF (ZEM) to find the best fit for your portfolio. SITE provides Technology, Finance, and Industrials exposures, while ZEM is primarily weighted in Technology, Finance, and Non-Energy Materials. When evaluating costs, SITE features a management fee (MER) of 0.18%, compared to 0.25% for ZEM. Performance-wise, SITE has returned 16.87% year-to-date with +$36 M in net flows, whereas ZEM is at 18.8% with +$1 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
SITE
ZEM
| AuM | $239.53 M | $3,905.04 M |
| Management Fees | 0.18% | 0.25% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.28% | 0.27% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.16% | -1.09% |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SITE | -4.97% | -3.32% | +16.87% | +14.55% | +75.23% |
ZEM | -4.49% | -2.08% | +18.80% | +16.23% | +79.69% | |
| Flows | SITE | +$4 M | +$10 M | +$36 M | +$40 M | +$69 M |
ZEM | +$371 M | +$583 M | +$1,394 M | +$1,649 M | +$1,714 M |
SITE vs ZEM exposure
Countries
SITE
Taiwan
27.25%
Republic of Korea
22.32%
China
16.46%
India
12.07%
Other
21.90%
ZEM
Taiwan
28.84%
Republic of Korea
21.32%
China
17.71%
India
10.61%
Other
21.53%
Sectors
SITE
Technology
45.35%
Finance
21.48%
Other
33.17%
ZEM
Technology
46.62%
Finance
21.05%
Other
32.33%
As of November 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
SITE
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
14.94%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
7.84%
SK hynix, Inc.
6.19%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
2.77%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
2.02%
MediaTek, Inc.
1.95%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
1.04%
China Construction Bank Corp.
0.90%
Delta Electronics, Inc.
0.82%
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd.
0.76%
ZEM
US4642872349
100.00%
Diversification
SITE
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1,149 total
39.23%
ZEM
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1,169 total
100.00%
Characteristics
Compare
SITE
ZEM
| Provider | Scotia Bank | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Solactive GBS Emerging Markets Large & Mid Cap CAD Index NTR - CAD | MSCI Emerging Markets Net Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.83% | 1.88% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | November 16, 2022 | October 20, 2009 |
Frequently asked questions about SITE and ZEM
Which ETF has performed better year to date: SITE or ZEM?
As of November 11, 2026, SITE has returned 16.87% year to date, while ZEM has returned 18.80%. ZEM is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: SITE or ZEM?
As of November 11, 2026, SITE manages $239.53 M in assets, while ZEM manages $3.91 B. ZEM is the larger fund by AUM.
How are SITE and ZEM managed?
SITE is passively managed by Scotia Bank. It tracks the Solactive GBS Emerging Markets Large & Mid Cap CAD Index NTR - CAD benchmark. ZEM is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is more diversified: SITE or ZEM?
SITE holds 1086 securities, while ZEM holds 1. On holdings count, SITE is the more diversified portfolio.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: SITE or ZEM?
Year to date, SITE has seen +$36.33 M in net flows, compared with +$1,393.65 M for ZEM. ZEM has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of SITE and ZEM compare?
SITE has an expense ratio of 0.28%, while ZEM has an expense ratio of 0.27%.
What sectors do SITE and ZEM emphasize?
SITE is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Industrials. ZEM is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Non-Energy Materials.
Recent articles about SITE and ZEM
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.