VS
Compare Scotia US Equity Index Tracker ETF (SITU) vs CI U.S. 500 Index ETF (CUSA.B) to find the best fit for your portfolio. SITU and CUSA.B provide the same top sector exposures: Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, SITU features a management fee (MER) of 0.05%, compared to 0.08% for CUSA.B. Performance-wise, SITU has returned 15.73% year-to-date with +$575 M in net flows, whereas CUSA.B is at 15.7% with +$27 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
SITU
CUSA.B
| AuM | $4,663.17 M | $303.80 M |
| Management Fees | 0.05% | 0.08% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.08% | 0.08% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.08% | -0.13% |
Historical performance and flows
As of August 6, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SITU | +0.68% | +8.03% | +15.73% | +24.72% | +85.92% |
CUSA.B | +0.67% | +8.01% | +15.70% | +24.65% | +85.74% | |
| Flows | SITU | +$72 M | +$136 M | +$575 M | +$1,023 M | +$2,690 M |
CUSA.B | -$0 M | -$0 M | +$27 M | +$43 M | +$38 M |
SITU vs CUSA.B exposure
Countries
SITU
USA
97.34%
CUSA.B
USA
97.34%
Sectors
SITU
Technology
45.69%
Finance
12.85%
Healthcare
8.79%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.70%
Industrials
8.15%
Other
15.82%
CUSA.B
Technology
45.69%
Finance
12.85%
Healthcare
8.79%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.70%
Industrials
8.15%
Other
15.82%
As of August 6, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
SITU
NVIDIA Corp.
7.19%
Apple, Inc.
6.37%
Microsoft Corp.
4.21%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.52%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.20%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.75%
Broadcom Inc.
2.70%
Tesla, Inc.
2.16%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.00%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.90%
CUSA.B
NVIDIA Corp.
7.19%
Apple, Inc.
6.37%
Microsoft Corp.
4.21%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.52%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.20%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.75%
Broadcom Inc.
2.70%
Tesla, Inc.
2.16%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.00%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.90%
Diversification
SITU
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 507 total
36.00%
CUSA.B
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 507 total
36.00%
Characteristics
Compare
SITU
CUSA.B
| Provider | Scotia Bank | CI |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Solactive GBS United States 500 CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD | Solactive GBS United States 500 CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.87% | 0.84% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | March 11, 2020 | August 17, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about SITU and CUSA.B
Which ETF has performed better year to date: SITU or CUSA.B?
As of August 6, 2026, SITU has returned 15.73% year to date, while CUSA.B has returned 15.70%. SITU is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: SITU or CUSA.B?
As of August 6, 2026, SITU manages $4.66 B in assets, while CUSA.B manages $303.80 M. SITU is the larger fund by AUM.
How are SITU and CUSA.B managed?
SITU is passively managed by Scotia Bank. It tracks the Solactive GBS United States 500 CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. CUSA.B is passively managed by CI. It tracks the Solactive GBS United States 500 CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do SITU and CUSA.B emphasize?
SITU is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. CUSA.B is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: SITU or CUSA.B?
Year to date, SITU has seen +$574.71 M in net flows, compared with +$26.77 M for CUSA.B. SITU has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of SITU and CUSA.B compare?
SITU has an expense ratio of 0.08%, while CUSA.B has an expense ratio of 0.08%.
What are the top holdings of SITU and CUSA.B?
SITU's largest holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc.. CUSA.B's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: SITU or CUSA.B?
SITU holds 498 securities, while CUSA.B holds 498. On holdings count, SITU is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about SITU and CUSA.B
CI Global Asset Management launches the CI U.S. 500 Index ETF
The currency-hedged ETF provides low-cost exposure to the U.S. stock market.
Posted on 5/23/2024 by Kyle Anthony inETF Ecosystem
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.