SITU
Scotia US Equity Index Tracker ETF

Full SITU fund page
VS
HULC
Global X US Large Cap Index Corporate Class ETF

Full HULC fund page

Compare Scotia US Equity Index Tracker ETF (SITU) vs Global X US Large Cap Index Corporate Class ETF (HULC) to find the best fit for your portfolio. SITU and HULC provide the same top sector exposures: Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, SITU features a management fee (MER) of 0.05%, compared to 0.09% for HULC. Performance-wise, SITU has returned 15.73% year-to-date with +$575 M in net flows, whereas HULC is at 15.67% with +$166 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-4.0-3.0-2.0-1.00.01.0%Jul 6Jul 13Jul 20Jul 27Aug 4

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of August 6, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
SITU
+0.68%+8.03%+15.73%+24.72%+85.92%
HULC
+0.71%+7.78%+15.67%+24.92%+86.90%
Flows
SITU
+$72 M+$136 M+$575 M+$1,023 M+$2,690 M
HULC
+$23 M+$74 M+$166 M+$231 M+$89 M

SITU vs HULC exposure

Countries

SITU
USA
97.34%
HULC
USA
97.63%

Sectors

SITU
Technology
45.69%
Finance
12.85%
Healthcare
8.79%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.70%
Industrials
8.15%
Other
15.82%
HULC
Technology
45.00%
Finance
12.93%
Healthcare
9.06%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.74%
Industrials
8.24%
Other
16.03%
As of August 6, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

SITU
NVIDIA Corp.
7.19%
Apple, Inc.
6.37%
Microsoft Corp.
4.21%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.52%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.20%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.75%
Broadcom Inc.
2.70%
Tesla, Inc.
2.16%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.00%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.90%
HULC
NVIDIA Corp.
7.07%
Apple, Inc.
6.25%
Microsoft Corp.
4.19%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.58%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.19%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.76%
Broadcom Inc.
2.68%
Tesla, Inc.
2.13%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.00%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.91%

Diversification

SITU
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 507 total
36.00%
HULC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 506 total
35.78%

Characteristics

Compare
SITU
HULC
ProviderScotia BankGlobal X
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkSolactive GBS United States 500 CAD Net Total Return Index - CADSolactive US Large Cap Index NTR - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingCapitalization
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.87%0.00%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateMarch 11, 2020February 6, 2020

Frequently asked questions about SITU and HULC

Which ETF has performed better year to date: SITU or HULC?
As of August 6, 2026, SITU has returned 15.73% year to date, while HULC has returned 15.67%. SITU is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: SITU or HULC?
As of August 6, 2026, SITU manages $4.66 B in assets, while HULC manages $799.05 M. SITU is the larger fund by AUM.
How are SITU and HULC managed?
SITU is passively managed by Scotia Bank. It tracks the Solactive GBS United States 500 CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. HULC is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive US Large Cap Index NTR - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do SITU and HULC emphasize?
SITU is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. HULC is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: SITU or HULC?
Year to date, SITU has seen +$574.71 M in net flows, compared with +$165.63 M for HULC. SITU has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of SITU and HULC compare?
SITU has an expense ratio of 0.08%, while HULC has an expense ratio of 0.09%.
What are the top holdings of SITU and HULC?
SITU's largest holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc.. HULC's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: SITU or HULC?
SITU holds 498 securities, while HULC holds 497. On holdings count, SITU is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about SITU and HULC

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds